Submaximal physical strain and peak performance in handcycling versus handrim wheelchair propulsion

被引:95
作者
Dallmeijer, AJ [1 ]
Zentgraaff, IDB [1 ]
Zijp, NI [1 ]
van der Woude, LHV [1 ]
机构
[1] Free Univ Amsterdam, Fac Human Movement Sci, Inst Fundamental & Clin Human Movement Sci, NL-1081 BT Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
handcycling; gross mechanical efficiency; heart rate; oxygen uptake; paraplegia; nondisabled subjects; power output;
D O I
10.1038/sj.sc.3101566
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study design: Experimental study in subjects with paraplegia and nondisabled subjects. Objective: To compare submaximal physical strain and peak performance in handcycling and handrim wheelchair propulsion in wheelchair-dependent and nondisabled control subjects. Setting: Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Methods: Nine male subjects with paraplegia and 10 nondisabled male subjects performed two exercise tests on a motor-driven treadmill using a handrim wheelchair and attach-unit handcycle system. The exercise protocol consisted of two 4-min submaximal exercise bouts at 25 and 35 W, followed by 1-min exercise bouts with increasing power output until exhaustion. Results: Analysis of variance for repeated measures showed a significantly lower oxygen uptake (VO2), ventilation (Ve), heart rate (HR), rate of perceived exertion and a higher gross efficiency for handcycling at 35 W in both subject groups, while no significant differences were found at 25 W. Peak power output and peak VO2, Ve and HR were significantly higher during handcycling in both groups. The differences between handcycling and wheelchair propulsion were the same in subjects with paraplegia and the nondisabled subjects. Conclusions: Handcycling induces significantly less strain at a moderate submaximal level of 35 W, and shows noticeably higher maximal exercise responses than wheelchair propulsion, which is consistent in subjects with paraplegia and nondisabled controls. These results demonstrate that handcycling is beneficial for mobility in daily life of wheelchair users.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 98
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Effectiveness of force application in manual wheelchair propulsion in persons with spinal cord injuries [J].
Dallmeijer, AJ ;
van der Woude, LHV ;
Veeger, HEJD ;
Hollander, AP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 1998, 77 (03) :213-221
[2]   MAXIMAL PHYSIOLOGICAL-RESPONSES DURING ARM CRANKING AND TREADMILL WHEELCHAIR PROPULSION IN T4-T6 PARAPLEGIC MEN [J].
GASS, EM ;
HARVEY, LA ;
GASS, GC .
PARAPLEGIA, 1995, 33 (05) :267-270
[3]  
GASS GC, 1984, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V16, P355
[4]   PHYSIOLOGICAL-RESPONSES TO MAXIMAL EFFORT WHEELCHAIR AND ARM CRANK ERGOMETRY [J].
GLASER, RM ;
SAWKA, MN ;
BRUNE, MF ;
WILDE, SW .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1980, 48 (06) :1060-1064
[5]   Muscular efficiency during arm cranking and wheelchair exercise: A comparison [J].
Hintzy, F ;
Tordi, N ;
Perrey, S .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2002, 23 (06) :408-414
[6]  
HOPMAN MTE, 1992, EUR J APPL PHYSIOL O, V65, P73
[7]  
MacArdle W. D., 1996, EXERCISE PHYSL ENERG
[8]   PHYSIOLOGICAL-RESPONSES TO MAXIMAL EXERCISE ON ARM CRANKING AND WHEELCHAIR ERGOMETER WITH PARAPLEGICS [J].
MARTEL, G ;
NOREAU, L ;
JOBIN, J .
PARAPLEGIA, 1991, 29 (07) :447-456
[9]   ARM CRANK VERSUS WHEELCHAIR TREADMILL ERGOMETRY TO EVALUATE THE PERFORMANCE OF PARAPLEGICS [J].
MCCONNELL, TJ ;
HORVAT, MA ;
BEUTELHORVAT, TA ;
GOLDING, LA .
PARAPLEGIA, 1989, 27 (04) :307-313
[10]   Comparison of asynchronous versus synchronous arm crank ergometry [J].
Mossberg, K ;
Willman, C ;
Topor, MA ;
Crook, H ;
Patak, S .
SPINAL CORD, 1999, 37 (08) :569-574