Quality of life associated with visual loss - A time tradeoff utility analysis comparison with medical health states

被引:104
作者
Brown, MM
Brown, GC
Sharma, S
Busbee, B
机构
[1] Ctr Value Based Med, Flourtown, PA 19031 USA
[2] Jefferson Med Coll, Wills Eye Hosp, Cataract & Primary Eye Care Serv, Philadelphia, PA USA
[3] Jefferson Med Coll, Wills Eye Hosp, Retina Vasc Unit, Philadelphia, PA USA
[4] Queens Med Coll, Dept Ophthalmol, Ocular Cost Effect Hlth Policy Unit, Kingston, ON, Canada
[5] Queens Med Coll, Dept Epidemiol, Ocular Cost Effect Hlth Policy Unit, Kingston, ON, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00254-9
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess the visual utility values of patients with ocular disease and to compare these values with those of patients with systemic health states Design: Cross-sectional utility value assessment. Methods: Consecutive patients with ophthalmic diseases were interviewed in a one-on-one fashion using a standardized time tradeoff utility value assessment form. These values were compared with utility values for systemic health states present in the literature. Intervention: None. Main Outcome Measure: Time tradeoff utility value on a scale ranging from 1.0 (perfect visual health) to 0.0 (death). The ophthalmic patient groups were stratified into 4 visual groups dependent on the visual acuity in the better-seeing eye. The groups were as follows: group 1, 20/20 to 20/25; group 2, 20/30 to 20/50; group 3, 20/60 to 20/100; group 4, 20/200 to no light perception. Results: A total of 500 subjects were enrolled in the study. The mean utility values for the visually stratified groups were: group 1, 0.88; group 2, 0.81; group 3, 0.72; group 4, 0.61. Comparable respective systemic health state utility values for each of the ophthalmic groups were: diabetes mellitus, status after kidney transplantation, moderate stroke, and moderately severe stroke. Conclusions: Visual loss is associated with a substantial and measurable diminution in quality of life. This diminution in quality of life can be directly compared with that induced by systemic health states. (C) 2003 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
引用
收藏
页码:1076 / 1081
页数:6
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   PATIENTS PREFERENCES IN RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
ANGELL, M .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1984, 310 (21) :1385-1387
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1996, ARCH OPHTHALMOL, V114, P417
[3]   The VF-14 index of functional visual impairment in candidates for a corneal graft [J].
Boisjoly, H ;
Gresset, J ;
Fontaine, N ;
Charest, M ;
Brunette, I ;
LeFrançois, M ;
Deschênes, J ;
Bazin, R ;
Laughrea, PA ;
Dubé, I .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1999, 128 (01) :38-44
[4]   Iliac arterial occlusive disease: Cost-effectiveness analysis of stent placement versus percutaneous transluminal angioplasty [J].
Bosch, JL ;
Tetteroo, E ;
Mali, WPTM ;
Hunink, MGM .
RADIOLOGY, 1998, 208 (03) :641-648
[5]   Managing pharmaceutical expenditure while increasing access - The Pharmaceutical Management Agency (PHARMAC) experience [J].
Braae, R ;
McNee, W ;
Moore, D .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 1999, 16 (06) :649-660
[6]  
Broman AT, 2001, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V42, P606
[7]  
Brown G C, 1999, Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc, V97, P473
[8]  
Brown G C, 2000, Qual Manag Health Care, V9, P23
[9]  
Brown G C, 2001, Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc, V99, P199
[10]   Cost-effectiveness of treatment for threshold retinopathy of prematurity [J].
Brown, GC ;
Brown, MM ;
Sharma, S ;
Tasman, W ;
Brown, HC .
PEDIATRICS, 1999, 104 (04) :e47