Appropriate patient selection in the focal treatment of prostate cancer: The role of transperineal 3-dimensional pathologic mapping of the prostate - A 4-year experience

被引:148
作者
Barzell, Winston E. [1 ]
Melamed, Myron R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Urol Treatment Ctr, Sarasota, FL USA
[2] New York Med Coll, Dept Pathol, Valhalla, NY 10595 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2007.06.1126
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
This study was undertaken to evaluate the usefulness of transperineal mapping biopsy of the prostate as a staging procedure in the appropriate selection of patients for treatment with focal cryoablation. Between October 2001 and January 2006, a total of 80 patients underwent extensive template-guided transperineal pathologic mapping of the prostate (3-DPM), in conjunction with repeat transrectal ultrasound, (TRUS)-guided biopsies. Before 3-DPM was performed, the following clinical variables were recorded: age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), percent free PSA, total prostate volume, transition zone volume, Gleason score, TNM stage, number of positive cores, and maximum percent of positive cores. Results of 3-DPM were compared with those of TRUS-guided biopsies to determine patient suitability for focal cryoablation; this served as the study end point. Of 80 study patients, 43 (54%) were deemed unsuitable for focal cryoablation. When compared with 3-DPM in assessing patient suitability for focal cryoablation repeat TRUS-guided biopsies yielded a false-negative rate of 47%, a sensitivity of 54%, and a negative predictive value of 49%. None of the pre-3-DPM variables correlated significantly with patient suitability for focal ablation. Treatment selected by the 80 study patients included total gland cryoablation (30%), expectant management (23%), radical prostatectomy (18%), focal cryoablation (11%), external irradiation (10%), brachytherapy (6%), and combined external irradiation and brachytherapy (1%); 1% were undecided about treatment selection. In this study, we demonstrated that 3-DPM (1) effectively excluded patients with clinically significant unsuspected cancer outside the area destined to be ablated, (2) appeared to do so more effectively than repeat TRUS-guided biopsies, and (3) was able to precisely locate the site of the cancer to be selectively ablated.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 35
页数:9
相关论文
共 48 条
[41]   The efficacy and complications of salvage cryotherapy of the prostate [J].
Pisters, LL ;
vonEschenbach, AC ;
Scott, SM ;
Swanson, DA ;
Dinney, CPN ;
Pettaway, CA ;
Babaian, RJ .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 157 (03) :921-925
[42]   Prostate cryoablation: A scientific rationale for future modifications [J].
Rukstalis, DB ;
Goldknopf, JL ;
Crowley, EM ;
Garcia, FU .
UROLOGY, 2002, 60 (2A) :19-25
[43]   Prostate cancer diagnosis using a saturation needle biopsy technique after previous negative sextant biopsies [J].
Stewart, CS ;
Leibovich, BC ;
Weaver, AL ;
Lieber, MM .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (01) :86-91
[44]   Limitations of biopsy Gleason grade: Implications for counseling patients with biopsy Gleason score 6 prostate cancer [J].
Sved, PD ;
Gomez, P ;
Manoharan, M ;
Kim, SS ;
Soloway, MS .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 172 (01) :98-102
[45]  
TAKEFUMI S, 2005, UROLOGY, V66, P114
[46]  
WHITMORE WF, 1991, CANCER, V67, P1091, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19910215)67:4<1091::AID-CNCR2820670437>3.0.CO
[47]  
2-J
[48]  
Wong WS, 1997, CANCER, V79, P963