Application of an advanced real options approach for renewable energy generation projects planning

被引:72
作者
Martinez-Cesena, E. A. [1 ]
Mutale, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Sch Elect & Elect Engn, Manchester M60 1QD, Lancs, England
关键词
Real options (RO); Uncertainty; Optimization; Mixed-integer nonlinear programming; Hydropower; POWER-GENERATION; INVESTMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2011.01.016
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Nowadays, there is growing interest in renewable energy (RE) generation projects due to environmental and sustainability concerns. However, initial costs and uncertainties caused by RE source variability, changes in support schemes, and other factors can render RE projects unattractive when subject to conventional financial assessment. Initial research suggests that the value of RE projects can be enhanced by the application of real options (RO) theory in the planning and evaluation of such projects. Literature on application of RO planning in RE generation projects is limited, and typically focuses solely on flexible investment decisions and neglects flexible design A more comprehensive approach should address flexibility in designs. This paper proposes an advanced RO methodology for RE generation projects planning, and illustrates the methodology using variations of a hydropower case study. The fundamental differences between advanced RO approaches and other techniques are illustrated on a simple case study. The complete version of the proposed advanced methodology is then compared against other available tools. The results show higher expected profits for projects planned with the advanced RO methodology. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2087 / 2094
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1997, The Kyoto Protocol
[2]  
Bilinton R., 1994, Reliability Assessment of Electric Power systems Using Monte Carlo Methods
[3]   PRICING OF OPTIONS AND CORPORATE LIABILITIES [J].
BLACK, F ;
SCHOLES, M .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1973, 81 (03) :637-654
[4]   Optimal investments in power generation under centralized and decentralized decision making [J].
Botterud, A ;
Ilic, MD ;
Wangensteen, I .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2005, 20 (01) :254-263
[5]  
*CEER, 2008, STAT REV REN EN EFF
[6]  
Collette Y., 2003, MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIM
[7]   Power plant multistage investment under market uncertainty [J].
Correia, P. F. ;
Carvalho, P. M. S. ;
Ferreira, L. A. F. M. ;
Guedes, J. ;
Sousa, J. .
IET GENERATION TRANSMISSION & DISTRIBUTION, 2008, 2 (01) :149-157
[8]   Optimizing the level of renewable electric R&D expenditures using real options analysis [J].
Davis, GA ;
Owens, B .
ENERGY POLICY, 2003, 31 (15) :1589-1608
[9]  
de Neufville R., 2003, INTEGRATED ASSESSMEN, V4, P26, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1076/iaij.4.1.26.16461, DOI 10.1076/IAIJ.4.1.26.16461]
[10]   Real Options by Spreadsheet: Parking Garage Case Example [J].
de Neufville, Richard ;
Scholtes, Stefan ;
Wang, Tao .
JOURNAL OF INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS, 2006, 12 (02) :107-111