A comparison of buprenorphine treatment in clinic and primary care settings: a randomised trial

被引:60
作者
Gibson, AE
Doran, CM
Bell, JR
Ryan, A
Lintzeris, N
机构
[1] Univ New S Wales, Natl Drug & Alcohol Res Ctr, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Sydney Hosp, Langton Ctr, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Sydney Eye Hosp, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ London Kings Coll, Inst Psychiat, Natl Addict Ctr, London WC2R 2LS, England
关键词
D O I
10.5694/j.1326-5377.2003.tb05417.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare outcomes, costs and incremental cost-effectiveness of heroin detoxification performed in a specialist clinic and in general practice. Design and setting: Randomised controlled trial set in a specialist outpatient drug treatment centre and six off ice-based general practices in inner city Sydney, Australia. Participants: 115 people seeking treatment for heroin dependence, of whom 97 (84%) were reinterviewed at Day 8, and 78 (68%) at Day 91. Interventions: Participants were randomly allocated to primary care or a specialist clinic, and received buprenorphine for 5 days for detoxification, then were offered either maintenance therapy with methadone or buprenorphine, relapse prevention with naltrexone, or counselling alone. Main outcome measures: Completion of detoxification, engagement in post-detoxification treatment, and heroin use assessed at Days 8 and 91. Costs relevant to providing treatment, including staff time, medication use and diagnostic procedures, with abstinence from heroin use on Day 8 as the primary outcome measure. Results: There were no significant differences in the proportions completing detoxification (40/56 [71%] primary care v 46/59 [78%] clinic), participating in postwithdrawal treatment (28/56 [50%] primary care v 36/59 [61%] clinic), reporting no opiate use during the withdrawal period (13/56 [23%] primary care v 13/59 [22%] clinic), and in duration of postwithdrawal treatment by survival analysis. Most participants in both groups entered postwithdrawal buprenorphine maintenance. On an intention-to-treat basis, self-reported heroin use in the month before the Day 91 interview was significantly lower than at baseline (27 days/month at baseline, 14 days/month at Day 91; P < 0.001) and did not differ between groups. Buprenorphine detoxification in primary care was estimated to be $24 more expensive per patient than treatment at the clinic. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio reveals that, in this context, it costs $20 to achieve a 1% improvement in outcome in primary care. Conclusions: Buprenorphine-assisted detoxification from heroin in specialist clinic and primary care settings had similar efficacy and cost-effectiveness. Buprenorphine treatment can be initiated safely in primary care settings by trained GPs.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / 42
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
[11]   Are detoxification programmes effective? [J].
Mattick, RP ;
Hall, W .
LANCET, 1996, 347 (8994) :97-100
[12]  
*MED AUSTR, 2001, MIMS AUSTR
[13]   Preliminary assessment of a 10-day rapid detoxification programme using high dosage buprenorphine [J].
Vignau, J .
EUROPEAN ADDICTION RESEARCH, 1998, 4 :29-31
[14]   CLINICAL-PHARMACOLOGY OF BUPRENORPHINE - CEILING EFFECTS AT HIGH-DOSES [J].
WALSH, SL ;
PRESTON, KL ;
STITZER, ML ;
CONE, EJ ;
BIGELOW, GE .
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1994, 55 (05) :569-580
[15]   A meta-analysis comparing the effectiveness of buprenorphine and methadone [J].
West, SL ;
O'Neal, KK ;
Graham, CW .
JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE, 2000, 12 (04) :405-414