Assessment of the performance of ECC-ozonesondes under quasi-flight conditions in the environmental simulation chamber: Insights from the Juelich Ozone Sonde Intercomparison Experiment (JOSIE)

被引:259
作者
Smit, Herman G. J. [1 ]
Straeter, Wolfgang
Johnson, Bryan J.
Oltmans, Samuel J.
Davies, Jonathan
Tarasick, David W.
Hoegger, Bruno
Stubi, Rene
Schmidlin, F. J.
Northam, T.
Thompson, Anne M.
Witte, Jacquelyn C.
Boyd, Ian
Posny, Francoise
机构
[1] Res Ctr Juelich FZJ, Inst Chem & Dynam Geosphere Tropsphere ICG 2, D-52425 Julich, Germany
[2] Natl Ocean & Atmospher Adm, Earth Syst Res Lab, Global Monitoring Div, Boulder, CO USA
[3] Meteo Swiss, Aerol Stn Payeme, Payeme, Switzerland
[4] NASA, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Wallops Flight Facil, Wallops Isl, VA 23337 USA
[5] Penn State Univ, Dept Meteorol, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[6] SSAI, Lanham, MD USA
[7] Environm Res Inst, NIWA, Amherst, MA USA
[8] Univ Reunion Island, St Denis, Reunion, France
[9] NASA, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1029/2006JD007308
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
[1] Since 1996, quality assurance experiments of electrochemical concentration cell (ECC) ozonesondes of two different model types (SPC-6A and ENSCI-Z) have been conducted in the environmental simulation facility at the Research Centre Juelich within the framework of the Juelich Ozone Sonde Intercomparison Experiment (JOSIE). The experiments have shown that the performance characteristics of the two ECC-sonde types can be significantly different, even when operated under the same conditions. Particularly above 20 km the ENSCI-Z sonde tends to measure 5-10% more ozone than the SPC-6A sonde. Below 20 km the differences are 5% or less, but appear to show some differences with year of manufacture. There is a significant difference in the ozone readings when sondes of the same type are operated with different cathode sensing solutions. Testing the most commonly used sensing solutions showed that for each ECC-manufacturer type the use of 1.0% KI and full buffer gives 5% larger ozone values compared with the use of 0.5% KI and half buffer, and as much as 10% larger values compared with 2.0% KI and no buffer. For ozone sounding stations performing long term measurements this means that changing the sensing solution type or ECC-sonde type can easily introduce a change of +/- 5% or more in their records, affecting determination of ozone trends. Standardization of operating procedures for ECC-sondes yields a precision better than +/-(3-5)% and an accuracy of about +/-(5-10)% up to 30 km altitude.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   COMPARISON OF INSITU STRATOSPHERIC OZONE MEASUREMENTS OBTAINED DURING THE MAP-GLOBUS 1983 CAMPAIGN [J].
AIMEDIEU, P ;
MATTHEWS, WA ;
ATTMANNSPACHER, W ;
HARTMANNSGRUBER, R ;
CISNEROS, J ;
KOMHYR, W ;
ROBBINS, DE .
PLANETARY AND SPACE SCIENCE, 1987, 35 (05) :563-&
[2]   Evidence for changes in the ozone concentrations in the free troposphere over Southern France from 1976 to 1995 [J].
Ancellet, G ;
Beekmann, M .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1997, 31 (17) :2835-2851
[3]  
[Anonymous], 50 WORLD MET ORG
[4]  
ATTMANNSPACHER W, 1971, 2 INT OZ SOND INT OB, P157
[5]  
ATTMANNSPACHER W, 1970, INT OZONE SONDE INTE, P120
[6]   ELECTROCHEMICAL CONCENTRATION CELL OZONESONDE ACCURACY AND PRECISION [J].
BARNES, RA ;
BANDY, AR ;
TORRES, AL .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1985, 90 (ND5) :7881-7887
[7]   INTERCOMPARISON CAMPAIGN OF VERTICAL OZONE PROFILES INCLUDING ELECTROCHEMICAL SONDES OF ECC AND BREWER-MAST TYPE-A GROUND-BASED UV-DIFFERENTIAL ABSORPTION LIDAR [J].
BEEKMANN, M ;
ANCELLET, G ;
MEGIE, G ;
SMIT, HGJ ;
KLEY, D .
JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY, 1994, 19 (03) :259-288
[8]  
BEEKMANN M, 1970, ATMOS ENVIRON, V29, P1027
[9]   NEW DETERMINATION OF STOICHIOMETRY OF IODOMETRIC METHOD FOR OZONE ANALYSIS AT PH 7.0 [J].
BOYD, AW ;
WILLIS, C ;
CYR, R .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1970, 42 (06) :670-&
[10]   An assessment of ECC ozonesondes operated using 1% and 0.5% KI cathode solutions at Lauder, New Zealand [J].
Boyd, IS ;
Bodeker, GE ;
Connor, BJ ;
Swart, DPJ ;
Brinksma, EJ .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 1998, 25 (13) :2409-2412