The Justice Sensitivity Inventory: Factorial Validity, Location in the Personality Facet Space, Demographic Pattern, and Normative Data

被引:246
作者
Schmitt, Manfred [1 ]
Baumert, Anna [1 ]
Gollwitzer, Mario [2 ]
Maes, Juergen [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Koblenz Landau, Dept Psychol, D-76829 Landau, Germany
[2] Univ Marburg, Dept Psychol, D-35032 Marburg, Germany
[3] Univ Bundeswehr Munchen, Dept Educ, Neubiberg, Germany
关键词
Personality facets; Justice perceptions; Justice-related traits; Five-factor model of personality; Perpetrator sensitivity; ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE; INJUSTICE; VALIDATION; PUNISHMENT; CONSTRUCT; FAIRNESS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s11211-010-0115-2
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This article investigates the psychometric properties of a self-report inventory for measuring individual differences in four components of justice sensitivity (JS): victim sensitivity, observer sensitivity, beneficiary sensitivity, and perpetrator sensitivity. A representative sample (N = 2510) was employed to (a) estimate the reliability of a newly developed perpetrator sensitivity scale, (b) test the factorial validity of this scale together with three previously developed scales (victim, observer, and beneficiary sensitivity), (c) estimate correlations between JS and demographic variables (gender, age, education, employment status, marital status, and residency in East versus West Germany), and (d) provide normative data for the computation of standard scores. A demographically heterogeneous convenience sample (N = 327) was used to locate the JS dimensions in the personality space of narrow facet factors. Results from confirmatory factor analyses demonstrated the factorial validity of the JS scales. Regression analyses with JS scales as criteria and personality facet scales as predictors suggested that JS cannot be reduced to combinations of personality facets. Demographic effects were small, explaining a maximum of 1.4% of JS variance. Women and East Germans were found to be more justice sensitive than men and West Germans, respectively. Victim sensitivity decreased with age; perpetrator sensitivity decreased with education. Taken together, our results corroborate the validity of the JS Inventory and contribute to a better psychological understanding of JS.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 238
页数:28
相关论文
共 76 条
[51]   When Guilt Evokes Self-Punishment: Evidence for the Existence of a Dobby Effect [J].
Nelissen, Rob M. A. ;
Zeelenberg, Marcel .
EMOTION, 2009, 9 (01) :118-122
[52]   Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies [J].
Roberts, BW ;
Walton, KE ;
Viechtbauer, W .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2006, 132 (01) :1-25
[53]   WHO BELIEVES IN A JUST WORLD [J].
RUBIN, Z ;
PEPLAU, LA .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ISSUES, 1975, 31 (03) :65-89
[54]   THE STRUCTURE OF SOCIAL-JUSTICE JUDGMENTS - A FACET APPROACH [J].
SABBAGH, C ;
DAR, Y ;
RESH, N .
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY, 1994, 57 (03) :244-261
[55]   THE COMPLEX SUBSPACE ITERATION FOR THE COMPUTATION OF EIGENMODES IN LOSSY CAVITIES [J].
SCHMITT, D ;
SCHUHMANN, R ;
WEILAND, T .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NUMERICAL MODELLING-ELECTRONIC NETWORKS DEVICES AND FIELDS, 1995, 8 (06) :385-398
[56]   Justice sensitivity: Assessment and location in the personality space [J].
Schmitt, M ;
Gollwitzer, M ;
Maes, J ;
Arbach, D .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2005, 21 (03) :202-211
[57]  
Schmitt M, 1999, EUR J SOC PSYCHOL, V29, P443, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199906)29:4<443::AID-EJSP935>3.0.CO
[58]  
2-C
[59]   Individual differences in sensitivity to befallen injustice (SBI) [J].
Schmitt, M .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 1996, 21 (01) :3-20
[60]  
SCHMITT M, 2001, RESPONSIBILITY MANY, P167