Pulling force in lateral lifting and lowering

被引:10
作者
Huang, QM
Sato, M
Thorstensson, A
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Dept Neurosci, Biomech & Motor Control Lab, S-11486 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Univ Stockholm, Coll Phys Educ & Sports, Dept Human Biol, S-11486 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
eccentric; concentric; isokinetic; MVC; side-bending; static;
D O I
10.1080/001401398186711
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 [工学];
摘要
This work investigated maximal voluntary lateral hand pulling force in 18 healthy, habitually active men. Measurements were made in standing at different static angles of lateral trunk flexion, as well as at different constant lifting and lowering velocities. Movement was constrained to the frontal plane, velocity was controlled by an isokinetic dynamometer, pulling force was measured with a strain gauge and overall lateral angular displacement of the trunk by an electrogoniometer. Mean peak pulling force values ranged from 478 to 658 N (static), 291 to 528 N (lifting), and 801 to 911 N (lowering), respectively. The static pulling forces were the highest in flexed positions to the loaded side (10 degrees and 20 degrees trunk angles). In lifting, peak and position-specific pulling force decreased with increasing velocity. Peak lifting force occurred in a flexed trunk position of 7 to 9 degrees to the loaded side. In lowering, pulling forces were significantly higher than during lifting at corresponding velocities and showed less changes with velocity. Peak lowering force occurred at a trunk angle of -7 to -11 degrees, that is towards the unloaded side. In conclusion, maximal voluntary pulling force in the frontal plane was found to be task dependent. Lowering was accompanied by higher forces and a different velocity and position dependency than lifting which, in addition to the fact that the trunk muscles act predominantly eccentrically during the lowering task, may impose an increased risk of injury.
引用
收藏
页码:899 / 908
页数:10
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]
ANDERSSON E, 1988, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V20, P587
[2]
EPIDEMIOLOGIC ASPECTS ON LOW-BACK-PAIN IN INDUSTRY [J].
ANDERSSON, GBJ .
SPINE, 1981, 6 (01) :53-60
[3]
BACK PAIN IN MIDDLE-AGE - OCCUPATIONAL WORKLOAD AND PSYCHOLOGIC FACTORS - AN EPIDEMIOLOGIC SURVEY [J].
BERGENUDD, H ;
NILSSON, B .
SPINE, 1988, 13 (01) :58-60
[4]
LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF LOW-BACK PAIN AS ASSOCIATED WITH OCCUPATIONAL WEIGHT LIFTING FACTORS [J].
CHAFFIN, DB ;
PARK, KS .
AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 1973, 34 (12) :513-525
[5]
CHANGES IN INTRAABDOMINAL PRESSURE, TRUNK MUSCLE ACTIVATION AND FORCE DURING ISOKINETIC LIFTING AND LOWERING [J].
CRESSWELL, AG ;
THORSTENSSON, A .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY AND OCCUPATIONAL PHYSIOLOGY, 1994, 68 (04) :315-321
[6]
HERRIN GD, 1986, AM IND HYG ASSOC J, V47, P322, DOI 10.1202/0002-8894(1986)047<0322:POOIUB>2.3.CO
[7]
2
[8]
EPIDEMIOLOGY AND IMPACT OF LOW-BACK-PAIN [J].
KELSEY, JL ;
WHITE, AA .
SPINE, 1980, 5 (02) :133-142
[9]
STATIC AND DYNAMIC LIFTING STRENGTH AT DIFFERENT REACH DISTANCES IN SYMMETRICAL AND ASYMMETRICAL PLANES [J].
KUMAR, S ;
GARAND, D .
ERGONOMICS, 1992, 35 (7-8) :861-880
[10]
HUMAN TRUNK STRENGTH PROFILE IN LATERAL FLEXION AND AXIAL ROTATION [J].
KUMAR, S ;
DUFRESNE, RM ;
VANSCHOOR, T .
SPINE, 1995, 20 (02) :169-177