Preparation before colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial comparing different regimes

被引:64
作者
Jansen, Sita V. [1 ]
Goedhard, Jelle G. [1 ]
Winkens, Bjorn [2 ]
van Deursen, Cees Th B. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Atrium Med Ctr Parkstad, NL-6419 Heerlen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Med Ctr, AZ, Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
bowel preparation; PEG solutions; simethicone; sodium phosphate solution; BOWEL PREPARATION; IMPROVING VISIBILITY; LAVAGE; SIMETHICONE; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1097/MEG.0b013e32834a3444
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
100201 [内科学];
摘要
Background and aim A good bowel preparation is essential for optimal visualization of the large intestine. Several preparations with a difference in composition and volume are available. We compared five methods for bowel cleansing quality and patients' acceptability. Patients and methods Adult ambulatory outpatients scheduled for elective colonoscopy were randomized to receive 4-I polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution (Klean-prep), 2-I PEG solution + ascorbic acid (Moviprep), or a sodium phosphate (NaP) solution, Phosphoral. Patients with the PEG solutions were also randomized to receive simethicone (Aeropax), to investigate whether this improves the bowel cleansing efficacy. Before colonoscopy patients completed a questionnaire about the acceptability and tolerability of the preparation. Endoscopists blinded to the type of preparation gave a bowel cleansing score. Results Data were available for 461 patients. 2-I PEG + ascorbic acid was noninferior to 4-I PEG in bowel cleansing quality of rectosigmoid and colon. NaP was noninferior to 4-I PEG in bowel cleansing quality of rectosigmoid but inferior for the whole colon. Compliance was significantly less in the group with 4-I PEG compared with the 2-I PEG and NaP group. No difference was found for abdominal cramps. Taste was significantly better in the 2-I PEG group. Simethicone did not improve the bowel cleansing quality. Conclusion 2-I PEG + ascorbic acid was noninferior to the 4-I PEG solution in bowel cleansing quality and was better in taste and compliance. NaP was inferior to 4-I PEG in bowel cleansing quality. Addition of simethicone gave no improvement. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 23:897-902 (C) 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
引用
收藏
页码:897 / 902
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]
A randomized, controlled, double-blind trial of the adjunct use of tegaserod in whole-dose or split-dose polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution for colonoscopy preparation [J].
Abdul-Baki, Heitham ;
Hashash, Jana G. ;
ElHajj, Ihab I. ;
Azar, Cecilio ;
El Zahabi, Lara ;
Mourad, Fadi H. ;
Barada, Kassem A. ;
Sharara, Ala I. .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2008, 68 (02) :294-300
[2]
Altman D. G., 1991, PRACTICAL STAT MED R, P404
[3]
Effectiveness of polyethylene glycol antegrade gut lavage bowel preparation for colonoscopy - Timing is the key! [J].
Church, JM .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1998, 41 (10) :1223-1225
[4]
DAVIS GR, 1980, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V78, P991
[5]
Randomized trial of low-volume PEG solution versus standard PEG plus electrolytes for bowel cleansing before colonoscopy [J].
Ell, Christian ;
Fischbach, Wolfgang ;
Bronisch, Hans-Joachim ;
Dertinger, Stefan ;
Layer, Peter ;
Ruenzi, Michael ;
Schneider, Thomas ;
Kachel, Guenther ;
Grueger, Joerg ;
Koellinger, Michael ;
Nagell, Waltraud ;
Goerg, Karl-Josel ;
Wanitschke, Roland ;
Gruss, Hans-Juergen .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2008, 103 (04) :883-893
[6]
Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study [J].
Froehlich, F ;
Wietlisbach, V ;
Gonvers, JJ ;
Burnand, B ;
Vader, JP .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2005, 61 (03) :378-384
[7]
Fujita I, 2000, RES COMMUN MOL PATH, V107, P219
[8]
Hayes Ann, 2003, Gastroenterol Nurs, V26, P106, DOI 10.1097/00001610-200305000-00004
[9]
HEITHAM AB, 2008, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V68, P294
[10]
Acute phosphate nephropathy [J].
Markowitz, Glen S. ;
Perazella, Mark A. .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 76 (10) :1027-1034