A randomized, controlled, double-blind trial of the adjunct use of tegaserod in whole-dose or split-dose polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution for colonoscopy preparation

被引:56
作者
Abdul-Baki, Heitham [1 ]
Hashash, Jana G. [1 ]
ElHajj, Ihab I. [1 ]
Azar, Cecilio [1 ]
El Zahabi, Lara [1 ]
Mourad, Fadi H. [1 ]
Barada, Kassem A. [1 ]
Sharara, Ala I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Amer Univ Beirut, Med Ctr, Dept Internal Med, Div Gastroenterol, Beirut 72020, Lebanon
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.gie.2008.01.044
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Problems of compliance, quality, and safety of colon preparation regimens have prompted continued investigation with alternative forms of cleansing. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of tegaserod as an adjunct to a polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution (PEG-E), given as a whole dose or split close, in colonoscopy preparation. Design: Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. Setting: A single University-based hospital. Patients: Patients who were undergoing, elective colonoscopy. Interventions: A 4-arm randomization scheme that compared tegaserod with a placebo, each with whole-dose or split-close PEG-E preparation. Main Outcome Measurements: Efficacy of colon cleansing was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included adherence, tolerability, adverse effects, and patient perceptions of their preparation quality. Results: A total of 382 patients completed the trial. Patients who received the split-dose preparation had significantly better colon cleansing than those who received the whole-close preparation (88.9% vs 42.6%, P <.001). The addition of tegaserod did not significantly improve the overall colonoscopy preparation quality compared with a placebo. However, there were fewer poor preparations in the whole-dose PEG-E group (12.4% vs 1.1%, P =.002, Bonferroni correction removes significance) and more excellent preparations in the split-dose group (53.3% vs 38.3%, P =.035, Bonferroni correction removes significance) in favor of tegaserod. Interobserver and intraobserver variability analysis showed substantial agreement among endoscopists. Adherence was significantly lower in the whole-close group versus the split-close PEG-E group (68.8% vs 91%, P <.001), independent of the use of tegaserod. Adverse effects were not different between study groups. Limitations: A 4-arm randomization and the single-center nature of the study. Conclusions: Tegaserod has a marginal effect on the quality of colonoscopy preparation when used as an adjuvant to PEG-E. The split-close PEG-E was superior to the whole-dose PEG-E and resulted in better colon cleansing, adherence, and tolerance.
引用
收藏
页码:294 / 300
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   A randomized single-blind trial of split-dose PEG-electrolyte solution without dietary restriction compared with whole dose PEG-electrolyte solution with dietary restriction for colonoscopy preparation [J].
Aoun, E ;
Abdul-Baki, H ;
Azar, C ;
Mourad, F ;
Barada, K ;
Berro, Z ;
Tarchichi, M ;
Sharara, AI .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2005, 62 (02) :213-218
[2]   Clinical pharmacokinetics of tegaserod, a serotonin 5-HT4 receptor partial agonist with promotile activity [J].
Appel-Dingemanse, S .
CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 2002, 41 (13) :1021-1042
[3]   A novel tableted purgative for colonoscopic preparation: efficacy and safety comparisons with Colyte and Fleet Phospho-Soda [J].
Aronchick, CA ;
Lipshutz, WH ;
Wright, SH ;
Dufrayne, F ;
Bergman, G .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2000, 52 (03) :346-352
[4]   Use of oral sodium phosphate colonic lavage solution by Canadian colonoscopists: Pitfalls and complications [J].
Chan, A ;
Depew, W ;
Vanner, S .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1997, 11 (04) :334-338
[5]   Effect of tegaserod on gut transit in male and female subjects [J].
Degen, L ;
Petrig, C ;
Studer, D ;
Schroller, S ;
Beglinger, C .
NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2005, 17 (06) :821-826
[6]   Comparison of reduced volume Versus four liters sulfate-free electrolyte lavage solutions for colonoscopy colon cleansing [J].
DiPalma, JA ;
Wolff, BG ;
Meagher, A ;
Cleveland, MV .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2003, 98 (10) :2187-2191
[7]   Biochemical effects of oral sodium phosphate [J].
DiPalma, JA ;
Buckley, SE ;
Warner, BA ;
Culpepper, RM .
DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 1996, 41 (04) :749-753
[8]   A randomized single-blind trial of whole versus split-dose polyethylene glycol-electrolyte solution for colonoscopy preparation [J].
El Sayed, AMA ;
Kanafani, ZA ;
Mourad, FH ;
Soweid, AM ;
Barada, KA ;
Adorian, CS ;
Nasreddine, WA ;
Sharara, AI .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2003, 58 (01) :36-40
[9]   Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study [J].
Froehlich, F ;
Wietlisbach, V ;
Gonvers, JJ ;
Burnand, B ;
Vader, JP .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2005, 61 (03) :378-384
[10]   A prospective randomized trial comparing low-dose oral sodium phosphate plus stimulant laxatives with large volume polyethylene glycol solution for colon cleansing [J].
Hookey, LC ;
Depew, WT ;
Vanner, SJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 99 (11) :2217-2222