A prospective randomized trial comparing low-dose oral sodium phosphate plus stimulant laxatives with large volume polyethylene glycol solution for colon cleansing

被引:48
作者
Hookey, LC [1 ]
Depew, WT [1 ]
Vanner, SJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Queens Univ, Gastrointestinal Dis Res Unit, Kingston, ON, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.40482.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
This study examined whether the combination of a single dose (45 ml) oral sodium phosphate (NaP), four bisacodyl tablets (5 mg), and one bisacodyl enema (10 mg) preparation, Fleet Prep Kit 3 (FPK #3), was better tolerated and more efficacious than 4 L polyethylene glycol solution (PEG) for colonic cleansing prior to colonoscopy. One hundred and seventy-one patients were enrolled in this prospective, randomized, single-blinded study designed to detect a 20% or greater difference in patient tolerance and effectiveness in colonic cleansing between the two agents. The single dose of NaP and the bisacodyl tablets were administered at 1900 h and at 2100 h, respectively, the evening prior to colonoscopy and the bisacodyl enema 2 h before the procedure. PEG was consumed over 1-2 h the evening prior to colonoscopy. Most patients (84%) found the FPK #3 easy or tolerable compared to only 33% receiving PEG (p < 0.001). Over 40% could not complete the PEG. There was no detectable difference in the efficacy between the two preparations (p = 0.74). Comparison of biochemical and hemodynamic values obtained before and after colonic cleansing did not reveal any significant differences apart from hyperphosphatemia in a few patients (16%) receiving FPK #3 and minor changes in blood urea nitrogen and chloride. These findings suggest that FPK #3 is better tolerated and as safe as PEG but does not provide more efficacious cleansing of the colon.
引用
收藏
页码:2217 / 2222
页数:6
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED TRIAL COMPARING A NEW SODIUM PHOSPHATE-BISACODYL REGIMEN WITH CONVENTIONAL PEG-ES LAVAGE FOR OUTPATIENT COLONOSCOPY PREPARATION [J].
AFRIDI, SA ;
BARTHEL, JS ;
KING, PD ;
PINEDA, JJ ;
MARSHALL, JB .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1995, 41 (05) :485-489
[2]  
Ahmed M, 1996, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V91, P1261
[3]   SODIUM PHOSPHATE-INDUCED HYPERNATREMIA IN AN ELDERLY PATIENT - A COMPLEX PATHOPHYSIOLOGIC STATE [J].
ARADHYE, S ;
BRENSILVER, JM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 1991, 18 (05) :609-611
[4]   Prospective randomized trial comparing bowel cleaning preparations for colonoscopy [J].
Arezzo, A .
SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2000, 10 (04) :215-217
[5]   A novel tableted purgative for colonoscopic preparation: efficacy and safety comparisons with Colyte and Fleet Phospho-Soda [J].
Aronchick, CA ;
Lipshutz, WH ;
Wright, SH ;
Dufrayne, F ;
Bergman, G .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2000, 52 (03) :346-352
[6]   Carbohydrate-electrolyte rehydration protects against intravascular volume contraction during colonic cleansing with orally administered sodium phosphate [J].
Barclay, RL ;
Depew, WT ;
Vanner, SJ .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2002, 56 (05) :633-638
[7]   Symptomatic hypocalcemia from oral sodium phosphate: A report of two cases [J].
Boivin, MA ;
Kahn, SR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1998, 93 (12) :2577-2579
[8]   Postoperative hypocalcemic tetany caused by Fleet® Phospho®-Soda preparation in a patient taking alendronate sodium -: Report of a case [J].
Campisi, P ;
Badhwar, V ;
Morin, S ;
Trudel, JL .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1999, 42 (11) :1499-1501
[9]   Use of oral sodium phosphate colonic lavage solution by Canadian colonoscopists: Pitfalls and complications [J].
Chan, A ;
Depew, W ;
Vanner, S .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1997, 11 (04) :334-338
[10]  
Chia Y W, 1995, J R Coll Surg Edinb, V40, P374