The influence of spatial errors in species occurrence data used in distribution models

被引:404
作者
Graham, Catherine H. [1 ]
Elith, Jane [2 ]
Hijmans, Robert J. [3 ]
Guisan, Antoine [4 ]
Peterson, A. Townsend [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Loiselle, Bette A. [8 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Stony Brook, Dept Ecol & Evolut, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
[2] Univ Melbourne, Sch Bot, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia
[3] Univ Calif Berkeley, Museum Vertebrate Zool, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[4] Univ Lausanne, Dept Ecol & Evolut, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
[5] Univ Kansas, Museum Nat Hist, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
[6] Univ Kansas, Biodivers Res Ctr, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
[7] Univ Kansas, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
[8] Univ Missouri, Dept Biol, St Louis, MO 63121 USA
关键词
error; geo-referencing; locality points; predictive modelling algorithms; species distribution model; uncertainty;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01408.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
1. Species distribution modelling is used increasingly in both applied and theoretical research to predict how species are distributed and to understand attributes of species' environmental requirements. In species distribution modelling, various statistical methods are used that combine species occurrence data with environmental spatial data layers to predict the suitability of any site for that species. While the number of data sharing initiatives involving species' occurrences in the scientific community has increased dramatically over the past few years, various data quality and methodological concerns related to using these data for species distribution modelling have not been addressed adequately. 2. We evaluated how uncertainty in georeferences and associated locational error in occurrences influence species distribution modelling using two treatments: (1) a control treatment where models were calibrated with original, accurate data and (2) an error treatment where data were first degraded spatially to simulate locational error. To incorporate error into the coordinates, we moved each coordinate with a random number drawn from the normal distribution with a mean of zero and a standard deviation of 5 km. We evaluated the influence of error on the performance of 10 commonly used distributional modelling techniques applied to 40 species in four distinct geographical regions. 3. Locational error in occurrences reduced model performance in three of these regions; relatively accurate predictions of species distributions were possible for most species, even with degraded occurrences. Two species distribution modelling techniques, boosted regression trees and maximum entropy, were the best performing models in the face of locational errors. The results obtained with boosted regression trees were only slightly degraded by errors in location, and the results obtained with the maximum entropy approach were not affected by such errors. 4. Synthesis and applications. To use the vast array of occurrence data that exists currently for research and management relating to the geographical ranges of species, modellers need to know the influence of locational error on model quality and whether some modelling techniques are particularly robust to error. We show that certain modelling techniques are particularly robust to a moderate level of locational error and that useful predictions of species distributions can be made even when occurrence data include some error.
引用
收藏
页码:239 / 247
页数:9
相关论文
共 47 条
[31]   An evaluation of alternative algorithms for fitting species distribution models using logistic regression [J].
Pearce, J ;
Ferrier, S .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2000, 128 (2-3) :127-147
[32]   Modelling species distributions in Britain: a hierarchical integration of climate and land-cover data [J].
Pearson, RG ;
Dawson, TP ;
Liu, C .
ECOGRAPHY, 2004, 27 (03) :285-298
[33]   Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful? [J].
Pearson, RG ;
Dawson, TP .
GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2003, 12 (05) :361-371
[34]  
Peterson A.T., 2006, BIODIVERS INFORM, V3, P59, DOI DOI 10.17161/BI.V3I0.29
[35]   Predicting the geography of species' invasions via ecological niche modeling [J].
Peterson, AT .
QUARTERLY REVIEW OF BIOLOGY, 2003, 78 (04) :419-433
[36]   Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions [J].
Phillips, SJ ;
Anderson, RP ;
Schapire, RE .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2006, 190 (3-4) :231-259
[37]   Phylogeographic lineages and species comparisons in conservation analyses: A case study of california herpetofauna [J].
Rissler, LJ ;
Hijmans, RJ ;
Graham, CH ;
Moritz, C ;
Wake, DB .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2006, 167 (05) :655-666
[38]   Elevational gradient analyses and the use of historical museum specimens: a cautionary tale [J].
Rowe, RJ .
JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2005, 32 (11) :1883-1897
[39]  
Schapire R., 2003, MSRI WORKSH NONL EST, P1
[40]   The GARP modelling system: problems and solutions to automated spatial prediction [J].
Stockwell, D ;
Peters, D .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SCIENCE, 1999, 13 (02) :143-158