Return of individual research results from genome-wide association studies: experience of the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Network

被引:73
作者
Fullerton, Stephanie M. [1 ]
Wolf, Wendy A. [2 ]
Brothers, Kyle B. [3 ]
Clayton, Ellen Wright [3 ]
Crawford, Dana C. [3 ]
Denny, Joshua C. [3 ]
Greenland, Philip [4 ]
Koenig, Barbara A. [5 ,6 ]
Leppig, Kathleen A. [7 ]
Lindor, Noralane M. [5 ]
McCarty, Catherine A. [8 ,9 ]
McGuire, Amy L. [10 ]
Hinz, Eugenia R. McPeek [3 ]
Mirel, Daniel B. [11 ]
Ramos, Erin M. [12 ]
Ritchie, Marylyn D. [13 ]
Smith, Maureen E. [4 ]
Waudby, Carol J. [8 ]
Burke, Wylie [1 ]
Jarvik, Gail P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Childrens Hosp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Nashville, TN USA
[4] Northwestern Univ, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[5] Mayo Clin, Rochester, MN USA
[6] Univ Calif San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[7] Grp Hlth Cooperat Puget Sound, Seattle, WA USA
[8] Marshfield Clin Res Fdn, Marshfield, WI USA
[9] Essentia Inst Rural Hlth, Duluth, MN USA
[10] Baylor Coll Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[11] Broad Inst Harvard & MIT, Cambridge, MA USA
[12] NHGRI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[13] Penn State Univ, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
biorepository; context; deliberation; electronic medical records; result return; V-LEIDEN R506Q; TURNER-SYNDROME; HEREDITARY HEMOCHROMATOSIS; KLINEFELTER-SYNDROME; WORKING GROUP; PERSONALIZED MEDICINE; VENOUS THROMBOSIS; PARTICIPANTS; RECOMMENDATIONS; CONSORTIUM;
D O I
10.1038/gim.2012.15
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Purpose: Return of individual genetic results to research participants, including participants in archives and biorepositories, is receiving increased attention. However, few groups have deliberated on specific results or weighed deliberations against relevant local contextual factors. Methods: The Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Network, which includes five biorepositories conducting genome-wide association studies, convened a return of results oversight committee to identify potentially returnable results. Network-wide deliberations were then brought to local constituencies for final decision making. Results: Defining results that should be considered for return required input from clinicians with relevant expertise and much deliberation. The return of results oversight committee identified two sex chromosomal anomalies, Klinefelter syndrome and Turner syndrome, as well as homozygosity for factor V Leiden, as findings that could warrant reporting. Views about returning findings of HFE gene mutations associated with hemochromatosis were mixed due to low penetrance. Review of electronic medical records suggested that most participants with detected abnormalities were unaware of these findings. Local considerations relevant to return varied and, to date, four sites have elected not to return findings (return was not possible at one site). Conclusion: The eMERGE experience reveals the complexity of return of results decision making and provides a potential deliberative model for adoption in other collaborative contexts.
引用
收藏
页码:424 / 431
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   HFE-associated hereditary hemochromatosis [J].
Alexander, Jacob ;
Kowdley, Kris V. .
GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2009, 11 (05) :307-313
[2]   Iron-overload-related disease in HFE hereditary hemochromatosis [J].
Allen, Katrina J. ;
Gurrin, Lyle C. ;
Constantine, Clare C. ;
Osborne, Nicholas J. ;
Delatycki, Martin B. ;
Nicoll, Amanda J. ;
McLaren, Christine E. ;
Bahlo, Melanie ;
Nisselle, Amy E. ;
Vulpe, Chris D. ;
Anderson, Gregory J. ;
Southey, Melissa C. ;
Giles, Graham G. ;
English, Dallas R. ;
Hopper, John L. ;
Olynyk, John K. ;
Powell, Lawrie W. ;
Gertig, Dorota M. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2008, 358 (03) :221-230
[3]   Penetrance of the C28Y/C282Y genotype of the HFE gene [J].
Asberg, Arne ;
Hveem, Kristian ;
Kannelonning, Kjell ;
Irgens, Wenche Oiestad .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2007, 42 (09) :1073-1077
[4]   Klinefelter syndrome in clinical practice [J].
Bojesen, Anders ;
Gravholt, Claus H. .
NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE UROLOGY, 2007, 4 (04) :192-204
[5]   Reporting genetic results in research studies: Summary and recommendations of an NHLBI working group [J].
Bookman, EB ;
Langehorne, AA ;
Eckfeldt, JH ;
Glass, KC ;
Jarvik, GP ;
Klag, M ;
Koski, G ;
Motulsky, A ;
Wilfond, B ;
Manolio, TA ;
Fabsitz, RR ;
Luepker, RV .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A, 2006, 140A (10) :1033-1040
[6]   Disclosure of individual genetic data to research participants: the debate reconsidered [J].
Bredenoord, Annelien L. ;
Kroes, Hester Y. ;
Cuppen, Edwin ;
Parker, Michael ;
van Delden, Johannes J. M. .
TRENDS IN GENETICS, 2011, 27 (02) :41-47
[7]   Breast cancer risk among patients with Klinefelter syndrome [J].
Brinton, Louise A. .
ACTA PAEDIATRICA, 2011, 100 (06) :814-818
[8]   Dissection of the aorta in Turner syndrome: two cases and review of 85 cases in the literature [J].
Carlson, M. ;
Silberbach, M. .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 2007, 44 (12) :745-749
[9]   Confronting real time ethical, legal, and social issues in the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Consortium [J].
Clayton, Ellen Wright ;
Smith, Maureen ;
Fullerton, Stephanie M. ;
Burke, Wylie ;
McCarty, Catherine A. ;
Koenig, Barbara A. ;
McGuire, Amy L. ;
Beskow, Laura M. ;
Dressler, Lynn ;
Lemke, Amy A. ;
Ramos, Erin M. ;
Rodriguez, Laura Lyman .
GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2010, 12 (10) :616-620
[10]   How do you monitor the patient with Turner's syndrome in adulthood? [J].
Conway, Gerard S. ;
Band, Margaret ;
Doyle, Jacqueline ;
Davies, Melanie C. .
CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2010, 73 (06) :696-699