Can racial differences in cognitive test performance be reduced by presenting problems in a social context?

被引:29
作者
DeShon, RP
Smith, MR
Chan, D
Schmitt, N
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Dept Psychol, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Social Work & Psychol, Singapore 117548, Singapore
关键词
D O I
10.1037/0021-9010.83.3.438
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
It is well documented that African Americans tend to score lower on cognitive ability tests than White Americans. The cause of this performance difference is still being hotly debated and actively researched. Recently, J. E. Helms (1992) argued that cognitive ability tests fail to adequately assess African American intelligence because they do not account for the emphasis placed on social relations and the effect of social context on reasoning in the African American culture. To evaluate this argument, racial subgroup performance differences on Wason conditional reasoning items presented in the standard abstract form and in a social relationship form were examined. Contrary to Helms's argument, results indicate that presenting Wason conditional reasoning items in a social context did not reduce the difference between African American and White American performance.
引用
收藏
页码:438 / 451
页数:14
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Ashcraft M.H., 1994, HUMAN MEMORY COGNITI, V2nd
[2]  
Carpenter P. A., 1977, COGNITIVE PROCESS, P185
[3]  
CARTER RT, 1990, J COLL STUDENT DEV, V31, P71
[4]  
CATTELL RB, 1959, CULTURE FAIR TEST
[5]  
Ceci S. J., 1990, INTELLIGENCE MORE LE
[6]   Video-based versus paper-and-pencil method of assessment in situational judgment tests: Subgroup differences in test performance and face validity perceptions [J].
Chan, D ;
Schmitt, N .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 82 (01) :143-159
[7]   Reactions to cognitive ability tests: The relationships between race, test performance, face validity perceptions, and test-taking motivation [J].
Chan, D ;
Schmitt, N ;
DeShon, RP ;
Clause, CS ;
Delbridge, K .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 82 (02) :300-310
[8]   PRAGMATIC VERSUS SYNTACTIC APPROACHES TO TRAINING DEDUCTIVE REASONING [J].
CHENG, PW ;
HOLYOAK, KJ ;
NISBETT, RE ;
OLIVER, LM .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 18 (03) :293-328
[9]   PRAGMATIC REASONING SCHEMAS [J].
CHENG, PW ;
HOLYOAK, KJ .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1985, 17 (04) :391-416
[10]  
Cohen J., 1988, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, V2