Comparative clinical effectiveness of various 5-HT3 RA antiemetic regimens on chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting associated with hospital and emergency department visits in real world practice

被引:26
作者
Hatoum, Hind T. [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Swu-Jane [1 ,2 ]
Buchner, Deborah [3 ]
Cox, David [3 ]
机构
[1] Hind T Hatoum & Co, Chicago, IL 60647 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Coll Pharm, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[3] Eisai Inc, Woodcliff Lake, NJ 07677 USA
关键词
CINV; 5-HT3; RAs; Palonosetron; Comparative effectiveness; MODERATELY EMETOGENIC CHEMOTHERAPY; PHASE-III; RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST; BREAST-CANCER; DOUBLE-BLIND; PALONOSETRON; PREVENTION; ONDANSETRON; TRIAL; DEXAMETHASONE;
D O I
10.1007/s00520-011-1165-1
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
Purpose The aim of this study was to compare the risk of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) events for various 5-HT3 RAs in patients who received moderately (MEC) or highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) by evaluating hospital or emergency department (ED) admissions. Methods PharMetrics claims database was used to identify patients diagnosed with breast cancer (BC) who were initiated on cyclophosphamide-based adjuvant chemotherapy or with lung cancer (LC) initiated on carboplatin-based or cisplatin-based chemotherapy between 2005 and 2008. Patients were stratified in two groups: those initiated and maintained on palonosetron versus those treated with any other 5-HT3 RA regimens in the 6-month post first chemotherapy. Risk for CINV events, identified by ICD-9-CM for nausea, vomiting, and/or dehydration, were estimated using logistic regressions, controlling for age, gender, comorbidity, and total chemotherapy doses or days. Results Of the 4,868 cyclophosphamide-treated BC, 5,414 carboplatin-treated LC, and 1,692 cisplatin-treated LC identified, there were 1,864 BC (38.5%), 1,806 carboplatin-treated LC (33.4%), and 390 cisplatin-treated LC (23.0%) in the palonosetron-only group. Palonosetron-only group had significantly lower probability of CINV events associated with ED/hospital admissions in all three cohorts (3.5% vs. 6.3% in BC, 9.5% vs. 13.8% in carboplatin-treated LC, and 16.4% vs. 22.6% in cisplatin-treated LC, all at p<0.05). Logistic regressions found palonosetron-only group had significantly lower risk of CINV events (odds ratios=0.550, 0.653, and 0.689 in BC, carboplatin-treated LC and cisplatin-treated LC, respectively, p<0.05). Conclusion Patients with lung or breast cancer receiving MEC or HEC had significantly lower risk of CINV events associated with hospital/ED admissions if initiated and maintained on palonosetron relative to patients receiving 5-HT3 RA regimens.
引用
收藏
页码:941 / 949
页数:9
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]
A phase III, double-blind, randomized trial of palonosetron compared with ondansetron in preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting following highly emetogenic chemotherapy [J].
Aapro, M. S. ;
Grunberg, S. M. ;
Manikhas, G. M. ;
Olivares, G. ;
Suarez, T. ;
Tjulandin, S. A. ;
Bertoli, L. F. ;
Yunus, F. ;
Morrica, B. ;
Lordick, F. ;
Macciocchi, A. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2006, 17 (09) :1441-1449
[2]
30 years' follow up of randomised studies of adjuvant CMF in operable breast cancer: cohort study [J].
Bonadonna, G ;
Moliterni, A ;
Zambetti, M ;
Daidone, MG ;
Pilotti, S ;
Gianni, L ;
Valagussa, P .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 330 (7485) :217-220
[3]
A NEW METHOD OF CLASSIFYING PROGNOSTIC CO-MORBIDITY IN LONGITUDINAL-STUDIES - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION [J].
CHARLSON, ME ;
POMPEI, P ;
ALES, KL ;
MACKENZIE, CR .
JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (05) :373-383
[4]
Improved prevention of moderately emetogenic chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting with palonosetron, a pharmacologically novel 5-HT3 receptor antagonist -: Results of a phase III, single-dose trial versus dolasetron [J].
Eisenberg, P ;
Figueroa-Vadillo, J ;
Zamora, R ;
Charu, V ;
Hajdenberg, J ;
Cartmell, A ;
Macciocchi, A ;
Grunberg, S .
CANCER, 2003, 98 (11) :2473-2482
[5]
Palonosetron improves prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting following moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: results of a double-blind randomized phase III trial comparing single doses of palonosetron with ondansetron [J].
Gralla, R ;
Lichinitser, M ;
Van der Vegt, S ;
Sleeboom, H ;
Mezger, J ;
Peschel, C ;
Tonini, G ;
Labianca, R ;
Macciocchi, A ;
Aapro, M .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2003, 14 (10) :1570-1577
[6]
Grote Thomas, 2006, J Support Oncol, V4, P403
[7]
Effectiveness of a single-day three-drug regimen of dexamethasone, palonosetron, and aprepitant for the prevention of acute and delayed nausea and vomiting caused by moderately emetogenic chemotherapy [J].
Grunberg, Steven M. ;
Dugan, Matthew ;
Muss, Hyman ;
Wood, Marie ;
Burdette-Radoux, Susan ;
Weisberg, Tracey ;
Siebel, Marisa .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2009, 17 (05) :589-594
[8]
Hamadani Mehdi, 2007, J Oncol Pharm Pract, V13, P69, DOI 10.1177/1078155207078137
[9]
Randomized, placebo-controlled, pilot study evaluating aprepitant single dose plus palonosetron and dexamethasone for the prevention of acute and delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting [J].
Herrington, Jon D. ;
Jaskiewicz, Adam D. ;
Song, Juhee .
CANCER, 2008, 112 (09) :2080-2087
[10]
Li Y, 2009, ANN AM SOC HEM M NEW