Vaginal misoprostol compared with vaginal gemeprost in termination of second trimester pregnancy - A randomized trial

被引:60
作者
Wong, KS [1 ]
Ngai, CSW
Wong, AYK
Tang, LCH
Ho, PC
机构
[1] Kwong Wah Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, 25 Waterloo Rd, Kowloon, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
vaginal misoprostol; gemeprost; second trimester; abortion;
D O I
10.1016/S0010-7824(98)00099-7
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
A prospective randomized trial was conducted in 140 women to compare the efficacy of vaginal gemeprost with vaginal misoprostol for termination of second trimester pregnancy. Women requesting termination of second trimester pregnancy were randomized into two groups. Group A women were given 1 mg vaginal gemeprost every 3 h for a maximum of five doses in the first 24 h, whereas group B women were given 400 mu g vaginal misoprostol every 3 h for a maximum of five doses in 24 h. The median induction-abortion interval in the vaginal misoprostol group (14.1 h) was significantly shorter than that in the gemeprost group (19.5 h). The percentage of women who achieved successful abortion within 24 h in the misoprostol group (80.0%) was significantly higher than that in the gemeprost group (58.6%). There was no significant difference in the incidence of side effects between the two groups except for diarrhea, which was more common in the gemeprost group. The incidence of fever was more common in the misoprostol group. It is concluded that vaginal misoprostol is more effective than gemeprost in termination of second trimester pregnancy. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 210
页数:4
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1986, Clinical Trials
[2]   INDUCTION OF ABORTION IN THE 2ND TRIMESTER BY A COMBINATION OF MISOPROSTOL AND MIFEPRISTONE - A RANDOMIZED COMPARISON BETWEEN 2 MISOPROSTOL REGIMENS [J].
ELREFAEY, H ;
TEMPLETON, A .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1995, 10 (02) :475-478
[3]  
Ho PC, 1996, CONTRACEPTION, V53, P281
[4]   Vaginal misoprostol compared with oral misoprostol in termination of second-trimester pregnancy [J].
Ho, PC ;
Ngai, SW ;
Liu, KL ;
Wong, GCY ;
Lee, SWH .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 90 (05) :735-738
[5]   COMPARISON OF INTRAVAGINAL MISOPROSTOL WITH PROSTAGLANDIN-E(2) FOR TERMINATION OF 2ND-TRIMESTER PREGNANCY [J].
JAIN, JK ;
MISHELL, DR .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1994, 331 (05) :290-293
[6]   A comparison of misoprostol with and without laminaria tents for induction of second-trimester abortion [J].
Jain, JK ;
Mishell, DR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 175 (01) :173-177
[7]  
KARIM SMM, 1979, PRACTICAL APPL PROST, P375
[8]  
MEINERT CL, 1986, CLIN TRIALS DESIGN C, P71
[9]   A comparison of 600 and 200 mg mifepristone prior to second trimester abortion with the prostaglandin misoprostol [J].
Webster, D ;
Penney, GC ;
Templeton, A .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1996, 103 (07) :706-709
[10]   Termination of second trimester pregnancy with gemeprost and misoprostol: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial [J].
Wong, KS ;
Ngai, CSW ;
Chan, KS ;
Tang, LCH ;
Ho, PC .
CONTRACEPTION, 1996, 54 (01) :23-25