Event-related Potentials associated with masked priming of test cues reveal multiple potential contributions to recognition memory

被引:69
作者
Woollams, Anna M. [1 ]
Taylor, Jason R. [1 ]
Karayanidis, Frini [2 ]
Henson, Richard N. [1 ]
机构
[1] MRC, Cognit & Brain Sci Unit, Cambridge CB2 7EF, England
[2] Univ Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW 2308, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1162/jocn.2008.20076
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The relationship between recognition memory and repetition priming remains unclear. Priming is believed to reflect increased processing fluency for previously studied items relative to new items. Manipulations that affect fluency can also affect the likelihood that participants will judge items as studied in recognition tasks. This attribution of fluency to memory has been related to the familiarity process, as distinct from the recollection process, that is assumed by dual-process models of recognition memory. To investigate the time courses and neural Sources of fluency, familiarity, and recollection, we conducted an event-related Potential (ERP) study of recognition memory using masked priming of test cues and a remember/know paradigm. During the recognition test, studied and unstudied words were preceded by a brief, masked word that was either the same or different. Participants decided quickly whether each item had been studied ("old" or "new"), and for items called old, indicated whether they "remembered" (R) the encoding event, or simply "knew" (K) the item had been studied. Masked priming increased the proportion of K, but not R, judgments. Priming also decreased response times for hits but not correct rejections (CRs). Four distinct ERP effects were found. A medial-frontal FN400 (300-500 msec) was associated with familiarity (R, K Hits > CRs) and a centro-parietal late positivity (500-800 msec) with recollection (R Hits > K Hits, CRs). A long-term repetition effect was found for studied items judged "new" (Misses > CRs) in the same time window as the FN400, but with a posterior distribution. Finally, a centrally distributed masked priming effect was visible between 150 and 250 msec and continued into the 300-500 msec time window, where it was topographically dissociable from the FN400. These results suggest that multiple neural signals are associated with repetition and potentially contribute to recognition memory.
引用
收藏
页码:1114 / 1129
页数:16
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]   EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS, LEXICAL DECISION AND SEMANTIC PRIMING [J].
BENTIN, S ;
MCCARTHY, G ;
WOOD, CC .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1985, 60 (04) :343-355
[2]   A single-system account of the relationship between priming, recognition, and fluency [J].
Berry, Christopher J. ;
Shanks, David R. ;
Henson, Richard N. A. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2008, 34 (01) :97-111
[3]   On the relationship between repetition priming and recognition memory: Insights from a computational model [J].
Berry, Christopher J. ;
Henson, Richard N. A. ;
Shanks, David R. .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2006, 55 (04) :515-533
[4]   One process is not enough! A speed-accuracy tradeoff study of recognition memory [J].
Boldini, A ;
Russo, R ;
Avons, SE .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2004, 11 (02) :353-361
[5]   Electrophysiological correlates of familiarity in recognition memory and exclusion tasks [J].
Bridson, N. C. ;
Fraser, C. S. ;
Herron, J. E. ;
Wilding, E. L. .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 2006, 1114 :149-160
[6]   THE PROCESSING NATURE OF THE N400 - EVIDENCE FROM MASKED PRIMING [J].
BROWN, C ;
HAGOORT, P .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 1993, 5 (01) :34-44
[7]   On the reliability of implicit and explicit memory measures [J].
Buchner, A ;
Wippich, W .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 40 (03) :227-259
[8]   THE MRC PSYCHOLINGUISTIC DATABASE [J].
COLTHEART, M .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION A-HUMAN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1981, 33 (NOV) :497-505
[9]   On the contribution of perceptual fluency and priming to recognition memory [J].
Conroy, MA ;
Hopkins, RO ;
Squire, LR .
COGNITIVE AFFECTIVE & BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2005, 5 (01) :14-20
[10]   Differentiating amodal familiarity from modality-specific memory processes: An ERP study [J].
Curran, T ;
Dien, J .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2003, 40 (06) :979-988