One process is not enough! A speed-accuracy tradeoff study of recognition memory

被引:43
作者
Boldini, A [1 ]
Russo, R [1 ]
Avons, SE [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Essex, Dept Psychol, Colchester CO4 3SQ, Essex, England
关键词
D O I
10.3758/BF03196582
中图分类号
B841 [心理学研究方法];
学科分类号
040201 ;
摘要
Speed-accuracy tradeoff (SAT) methods have been used to contrast single- and dual-process accounts of recognition memory. In these procedures, subjects are presented with individual test items and are required to make recognition decisions under various time constraints. In this experiment, we presented word lists under incidental learning conditions, varying the modality of presentation and level of processing. At test, we manipulated the interval between each visually presented test item and a response signal, thus controlling the amount of time available to retrieve target information. Study-test modality match had a beneficial effect on recognition accuracy at short response-signal delays (less than or equal to300 msec). Conversely, recognition accuracy benefited more from deep than from shallow processing at study only at relatively long response-signal delays (greater than or equal to300 msec). The results are congruent with views suggesting that both fast familiarity and slower recollection processes contribute to recognition memory.
引用
收藏
页码:353 / 361
页数:9
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data [J].
Clark, SE ;
Gronlund, SD .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 1996, 3 (01) :37-60
[2]   Response deadline and subjective awareness in recognition memory [J].
Gardiner, JM ;
Ramponi, C ;
Richardson-Klavehn, A .
CONSCIOUSNESS AND COGNITION, 1999, 8 (04) :484-496
[3]   A RETRIEVAL MODEL FOR BOTH RECOGNITION AND RECALL [J].
GILLUND, G ;
SHIFFRIN, RM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1984, 91 (01) :1-67
[4]   Recognition memory and modality judgments: A comparison of retrieval dynamics [J].
Hintzman, DL ;
Caulton, DA .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1997, 37 (01) :1-23
[5]   RETRIEVAL DYNAMICS OF RECOGNITION AND FREQUENCY JUDGMENTS - EVIDENCE FOR SEPARATE PROCESSES OF FAMILIARITY AND RECALL [J].
HINTZMAN, DL ;
CURRAN, T .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1994, 33 (01) :1-18
[7]   Cross-modal feature and conjunction errors in recognition memory [J].
Jones, TC ;
Jacoby, LL ;
Gellis, LA .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2001, 44 (01) :131-152
[8]   Recollection and familiarity through the looking glass: When old does not mirror new [J].
Joordens, S ;
Hockley, WE .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2000, 26 (06) :1534-1555
[9]  
Kuera H., 1967, Computational Analysis of Present-Day American English
[10]   RECOGNIZING - THE JUDGMENT OF PREVIOUS OCCURRENCE [J].
MANDLER, G .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1980, 87 (03) :252-271