Comparison of paclitaxel- and sirolimus-eluting stents in everyday clinical practice -: The SORT OUT II Randomized trial

被引:105
作者
Galloe, Anders M. [1 ]
Thuesen, Leif [3 ]
Kelbaek, Henning [2 ]
Thayssen, Per [5 ]
Rasmussen, Klaus [4 ]
Hansen, Peter R. [1 ]
Bligaard, Niels [1 ]
Saunamaki, Kari [2 ]
Junker, Anders [5 ]
Aaroe, Jens [4 ]
Abildgaard, Ulrik [1 ]
Ravkilde, Jan [3 ]
Engstrom, Thomas [1 ]
Jensen, Jan S. [1 ]
Andersen, Henning R. [3 ]
Botker, Hans E. [3 ]
Galatius, Soren [1 ]
Kristensen, Steen D. [3 ]
Madsen, Jan K. [1 ]
Krusell, Lars R. [3 ]
Abildstrom, Steen Z. [1 ]
Stephansen, Ghita B. [1 ]
Lassen, Jens F. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Gentofte Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Rigshosp, Dept Cardiol, Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Univ Aarhus, Skejby Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Aarhus, Denmark
[4] Univ Aarhus, Aalborg Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Aarhus, Denmark
[5] Univ So Denmark, Odense Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Odense, Denmark
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 2008年 / 299卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.299.4.409
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context Approval of drug- eluting coronary stents was based on results of relatively small trials of selected patients; however, in routine practice, stents are used in a broader spectrum of patients. Objective To compare the first 2 commercially available drug- eluting stents sirolimus- eluting and paclitaxel- eluting - for prevention of symptom- driven clinical end points, using a study design reflecting everyday clinical practice. Design, Setting, and Patients Randomized, blinded trial conducted August 2004 to January 2006 at 5 university hospitals in Denmark. Patients were 2098 men and women ( mean [ SD] age, 63.6 [ 10.8] years) treated with percutaneous coronary intervention ( PCI) and randomized to receive either sirolimus- eluting ( n = 1065) or paclitaxel-eluting ( n = 1033) stents. Indications for PCI included ST- segment elevation myocardial infarction ( STEMI), non- STEMI or unstable angina pectoris, and stable angina. Main Outcome Measures The primary end point was a composite clinical end point of major adverse cardiac events, defined as either cardiac death, acute myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, or target vessel revascularization. Secondary end points included individual components of the composite end point, all- cause mortality, and stent thrombosis. Results The sirolimus- and the paclitaxel- eluting stent groups did not differ significantly in major adverse cardiac events ( 98 [ 9.3%] vs 114 [ 11.2%]; hazard ratio, 0.83 [ 95% confidence interval, 0.63- 1.08]; P=. 16) or in any of the secondary end points. The stent thrombosis rates were 27 ( 2.5%) and 30 ( 2.9%) ( hazard ratio, 0.87 [ 95% confidence interval, 0.52- 1.46]; P=. 60), respectively. Conclusion In this practical randomized trial, there were no significant differences in clinical outcomes between patients receiving sirolimus- and paclitaxel- eluting stents. Trial Registration clinicaltrials. gov Identifier: NCT00388934.
引用
收藏
页码:409 / 416
页数:8
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Anderson HV, 2000, CIRCULATION, V102, P2910
[2]   Head-to-head comparison between sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in patients with complex coronary artery disease:: An intravascular ultrasound study [J].
Cervinka, Pavel ;
Costa, Marco A. ;
Angiolillo, Dominick J. ;
Spacek, Radim ;
Bystron, Marian ;
Kvasnak, Martin ;
Veselka, Josef ;
Nanda, Hitesh ;
Futamatsu, Hideki ;
Futamatsu, Kino .
CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2006, 67 (06) :846-851
[3]   Paclitaxel-eluting or sirolimus-eluting stents to prevent restenosis in diabetic patients [J].
Dibra, A ;
Kastrati, A ;
Mehilli, J ;
Pache, J ;
Schühlen, H ;
von Beckerath, N ;
Ulm, K ;
Wessely, R ;
Dirschinger, J ;
Schömig, A .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 353 (07) :663-670
[4]   A prospective randomized comparison between paclitaxel and sirolimus stents in the real world of interventional cardiology -: The TAXi trial [J].
Goy, JJ ;
Stauffier, JC ;
Siegenthaler, M ;
Benoît, A ;
Seydoux, C .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 45 (02) :308-311
[5]   The enigma of drug-eluting stents - Hope, hype, humility, and advancing patient care [J].
Harrington, Robert A. ;
Ohman, E. Magnus .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2007, 297 (18) :2028-2030
[6]  
KALSER C, 2005, LANCET, V366, P921
[7]   Sirolimus-eluting stent or paclitaxel-eluting stent vs balloon angioplasty for prevention of recurrences in patients with coronary in-stent restenosis -: A randomized controlled trial [J].
Kastrati, A ;
Mehilli, J ;
von Beckerath, N ;
Dibra, A ;
Hausleiter, J ;
Pache, J ;
Schühlen, H ;
Schmitt, C ;
Dirschinger, J ;
Schömig, A .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 293 (02) :165-171
[8]   Surrogates, substudies, and real clinical end points in trials of drug-eluting stents [J].
Kereiakes, DJ ;
Kuntz, RE ;
Mauri, L ;
Krucoff, MW .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 45 (08) :1206-1212
[9]   Sirolimus-eluting stent versus paclitaxel-eluting stent for patients with long coronary artery disease [J].
Kim, Young-Hak ;
Park, Seong-Wook ;
Lee, Seung-Whan ;
Park, Duk-Woo ;
Yun, Sung-Cheol ;
Lee, Cheol Whan ;
Hong, Myeong-Ki ;
Kim, Hyun-Sook ;
Ko, Jae-Ki ;
Park, Jae-Hyeong ;
Lee, Jae-Hwan ;
Choi, Si Wan ;
Seong, In-Whan ;
Cho, Yoon Haeng ;
Lee, Nae-Hee ;
Kim, June Hong ;
Chun, Kook-Jin ;
Park, Seung-Jung .
CIRCULATION, 2006, 114 (20) :2148-2153
[10]   Stent thrombosis in randomized clinical trials of drug-eluting stents [J].
Mauri, Laura ;
Hsieh, Wen-hua ;
Massaro, Joseph M. ;
Ho, Kalon K. L. ;
D'Agostino, Ralph ;
Cutlip, Donald E. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 356 (10) :1020-1029