Investigation on the Possibility of Biowaivers for Ibuprofen

被引:56
作者
Alvarez, Covadonga [2 ]
Nunez, Ignacio [1 ,2 ]
Torrado, Juan J. [2 ]
Gordon, John [3 ]
Potthast, Henrike [4 ]
Garcia-Arieta, Alfredo [1 ]
机构
[1] Agencia Espanola Med & Prod Sanit, Subdirecc Gen Med Uso Humano, Div Farmacol & Evaluac Clin, Madrid 28022, Spain
[2] Univ Complutense Madrid, Fac Farm, Madrid, Spain
[3] Hlth Canada, Therapeut Prod Directorate, Bur Pharmaceut Sci, Div Biopharmaceut Evaluat, Ottawa, ON K1A 0L2, Canada
[4] Fed Inst Drugs & Med Devices, Subdept Biostat & Pharmacokinet, Bonn, Germany
关键词
bioequivalence; Biopharmaceutics classification system (BCS); dissolution; regulatory science; solubility; permeability; absorption; BIOPHARMACEUTICS CLASSIFICATION-SYSTEM; ORAL DOSAGE FORMS; WORKSHOP REPORT; ARGINATE; DRUGS; DISSOLUTION; FORMULATION; ABSORPTION; MONOGRAPHS; EXTENSION;
D O I
10.1002/jps.22472
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100705 [微生物与生化药学];
摘要
The aim of the study was to investigate the ability of in vitro dissolution to ensure bioequivalence of ibuprofen products. Ibuprofen is a Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) class II drug with low solubility at pH 1.2 and 4.5 and high solubility at pH 6.8. The possibility of extending the "BCS biowaivers" to weak acidic compounds has been suggested. Three ibuprofen formulations were compared in vitro and in vivo with the reference. Dissolution profiles in several pH buffers showed similarity at 75 and 50 rpm. However, the bioequivalence studies showed that two formulations were not equivalent in C-max because of a statistically significant difference. Conversely, another formulation was bioequivalent both in AUC and C-max in a pilot study (n = 10) and a final study (n = 18), demonstrating that the previous failures were not due to lack of statistical power, but due to a different absorption rate that cannot be detected in vitro. In conclusion, "biowaivers" for this type of class II drugs are not feasible because the dissolution tests do not detect differences in absorption rate. Differences in absorption rate cannot be neglected, not only because absorption rate has clinical relevance but also because the clinical importance of the differences cannot be assessed if they are not quantified. (C) 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc. and the American Pharmacists Association J Pharm Sci 100:2343-2349, 2011
引用
收藏
页码:2343 / 2349
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]
A THEORETICAL BASIS FOR A BIOPHARMACEUTIC DRUG CLASSIFICATION - THE CORRELATION OF IN-VITRO DRUG PRODUCT DISSOLUTION AND IN-VIVO BIOAVAILABILITY [J].
AMIDON, GL ;
LENNERNAS, H ;
SHAH, VP ;
CRISON, JR .
PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 1995, 12 (03) :413-420
[2]
BARENDS DM, 2007, AAPS WORKSH BE BCS N
[3]
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison of the analgesic efficacy, onset of action, and tolerability of ibuprofen arginate and ibuprofen in postoperative dental pain [J].
Black, P ;
Max, MB ;
Desjardins, P ;
Ardia, A ;
Pallotta, T .
CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2002, 24 (07) :1072-1089
[4]
The biopharmaceutics classification system (BCS): Class III drugs - better candidates for BA/BE waiver? [J].
Blume, HH ;
Schug, BS .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 1999, 9 (02) :117-121
[5]
Chow SC., 2000, Design and analysis of bioavailability and bioequivalence studies, V2nd
[6]
*COMM PROPR MED PR, 2001, NOT GUID INV BIOAV B
[7]
Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP), 2010, GUID INV BIOEQ
[8]
*COUNC EUR EUR DIR, EUR PHARM 2001 BUFF, P389
[9]
*COUNC EUR EUR DIR, 2002, EUR PHARM 2001 ABS S, P36
[10]
*COUNC EUR EUR DIR, 2010, EUR PHARM 2009 DIS S, P5091