How Area Sensitivity in Birds is Studied

被引:22
作者
Bayard, Trina S. [1 ,2 ]
Elphick, Chris S. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Connecticut, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
[2] Univ Connecticut, Ctr Conservat & Biodivers, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
关键词
area sensitivity; birds; habitat fragmentation; patch size; systematic review; CONSPECIFIC ATTRACTION; LANDSCAPE CONTEXT; GRASSLAND BIRDS; RAIN-FOREST; PATCH SIZE; CONSERVATION; EDGE; REQUIREMENTS; METAANALYSIS; ABUNDANCE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01480.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Studies of avian area sensitivity have been prolific over the last 3 decades, yet general conclusions about the phenomenon are lacking. We undertook a systematic literature review to determine how widespread area sensitivity is; whether published information is biased toward certain geographic regions, habitat types, or taxonomic groups; whether the nature of area effects varies with respect to these criteria; and whether tests of area effects for individual species produce consistent results. Analysis of over 2700 area sensitivity tests, from more than 870 species, indicated the phenomenon is widespread across regions, habitats, and taxonomic groups, but that significant biases in research focus exist. North American forest habitats and Passeriformes (especially Fringillidae, Regulidae, and Paridae) are disproportionately represented in the literature. Detection of area effects was more common in tests of occurrence (47%) than in those for abundance (25%) and varied significantly among regions, habitats, and taxonomic groups. Inconsistent results for species studied multiple times and between tests of occurrence and abundance were common. These results suggest a need for future research to focus more on why area sensitivity patterns differ among studies and less on simple pattern description.
引用
收藏
页码:938 / 947
页数:10
相关论文
共 54 条
[41]   AREA SENSITIVITY IN NORTH AMERICAN GRASSLAND BIRDS: PATTERNS AND PROCESSES [J].
Ribic, Christine A. ;
Koford, Rolf R. ;
Herkert, James R. ;
Johnson, Douglas H. ;
Niemuth, Neal D. ;
Naugle, David E. ;
Bakker, Kristel K. ;
Sample, David W. ;
Renfrew, Rosalind B. .
AUK, 2009, 126 (02) :233-244
[42]  
ROBBINS CS, 1989, WILDLIFE MONOGR, P1
[43]  
SAUNDERS DA, 1991, CONSERV BIOL, V9, P1072
[44]   Conservation ecology: Area trumps mobility in fragment bird extinctions [J].
Sekercioglu, Cagan H. .
CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2007, 17 (08) :R283-R286
[45]   Ecosystem consequences of bird declines [J].
Sekercioglu, ÇH ;
Daily, GC ;
Ehrlich, PR .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2004, 101 (52) :18042-18047
[46]   Landscape context influences salt marsh bird diversity and area requirements in New England [J].
Shriver, WG ;
Hodgman, TP ;
Gibbs, JP ;
Vickery, PD .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2004, 119 (04) :545-553
[47]   Effects of habitat fragmentation on avian nesting success: a review of the evidence at multiple spatial scales [J].
Stephens, SE ;
Koons, DN ;
Rotella, JJ ;
Willey, DW .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2004, 115 (01) :101-110
[48]   Species loss in fragments of tropical rain forest: A review of the evidence [J].
Turner, IM .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 1996, 33 (02) :200-209
[49]   Dispersal of Amazonian birds in continuous and fragmented forest [J].
Van Houtan, Kyle S. ;
Pimm, Stuart L. ;
Halley, John M. ;
Bierregaard, Richard O., Jr. ;
Lovejoy, Thomas E. .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2007, 10 (03) :219-229
[50]   Conspecific attraction and the conservation of territorial songbirds [J].
Ward, MP ;
Schlossberg, S .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2004, 18 (02) :519-525