Root growth, soil water content and yield of barley under different tillage systems on two soils in semiarid conditions

被引:151
作者
Lampurlanés, J [1 ]
Angás, P [1 ]
Cantero-Martínez, C [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lleida, IRTA, Dept Prod Vegetal & Ciencia Forestal, Lleida, Spain
关键词
root length density; soil water; conservation tillage; barley; semiarid;
D O I
10.1016/S0378-4290(00)00130-1
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
An experiment was conducted on two soils in a semiarid area in the Spain's Ebro valley. Soil A was a Fluventic Xerochrept of 120 cm depth and Soil was a Lithic Xeric Torriorthent of 30 cm depth. Three tillage systems were compared in Soil A: subsoiler tillage, minimum tillage and no-tillage, and two (minimum tillage and no-tillage) in Soil B. The experiment was repeated for 5 years on Soil A and 3 years on Soil B. Root length density, volumetric water content and dry matter were measured at important developmental stages. Yield was determined at harvest. In Soil A, root length density and volumetric water content were significantly greater for no-tillage than for subsoiler or minimum tillage (up to 1.4 cm cm(-3) and 5%, respectively), mainly in the upper part of the soil profile. At lower depths, differences as great as 0.8 cm cm(-3) and 6% were also found. Mean yield (4 years) was similar between no-tillage (3608 kg ha(-1)) and minimum tillage (3508 kg ha(-1)), and significantly smaller for subsoiler tillage (3371 kg ha(-1)). In Soil B, no differences were observed between tillage systems for volumetric water content. Significant interactions between tillage and year were found for root length density, dry matter and yield. Mean yield (3 years) was not significantly different for minimum tillage (1806 kg ha(-1)) and no-tillage (1867 kg ha(-1)). The results in Soil A showed that surface conditions are of major importance in the water content of the soil and determined the differences among tillage systems. No-tillage favoured greater and deeper water accumulation in the soil profile and greater root growth. This makes this system potentially better for years of low rainfall. In Soil B no tillage system proved to be better because of the low water-holding capacity of this soil (56 mm). (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 40
页数:14
相关论文
共 29 条
[21]  
Pearcy RW, 1989, PLANT PHYSL ECOLOGY
[22]   THE INFLUENCE OF TILLAGE METHODS ON SOIL PHYSICAL-PROPERTIES AND WATER-BALANCE FOR A TYPICAL CROP-ROTATION IN SW SPAIN [J].
PELEGRIN, F ;
MORENO, F ;
MARTINARANDA, J ;
CAMPS, M .
SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 1990, 16 (04) :345-358
[23]  
Reicosky D. C., 1983, Limitations to efficient water use in crop production, P471
[24]  
STEEL R.G.D., 1980, PRINCIPLES PROCEDURE
[25]  
Taylor H. M., 1983, Limitations to efficient water use in crop production, P87
[26]  
Unger P. W., 1980, Advances in Agronomy, V33, P1, DOI 10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60163-7
[27]  
Unger P. W., 1983, Limitations to efficient water use in crop production, P419
[28]  
VILLAR JM, 1989, EVAPOTRANSPIRACION P
[29]   QUANTITATIVE ESTIMATION OF LIVING WHEAT-ROOT LENGTHS IN SOIL CORES [J].
WARD, KJ ;
KLEPPER, B ;
RICKMAN, RW ;
ALLMARAS, RR .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1978, 70 (04) :675-677