In-stream geomorphic structures as drivers of hyporheic exchange

被引:200
作者
Hester, Erich T. [1 ]
Doyle, Martin W. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Curriculum Ecol, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Dept Geog, Chapel Hill, NC USA
关键词
D O I
10.1029/2006WR005810
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Common in-stream geomorphic structures such as debris dams and steps can drive hyporheic exchange in streams. Exchange is important for ecological stream function, and restoring function is a goal of many stream restoration projects, yet the connection between in-stream geomorphic form, hydrogeologic setting, and hyporheic exchange remains inadequately characterized. We used the models HEC-RAS, MODFLOW, and MODPATH to simulate coupled surface and subsurface hydraulics in a gaining stream containing a single in-stream geomorphic structure and to systematically evaluate the impact of fundamental characteristics of the structure and its hydrogeologic setting on induced exchange. We also conducted a field study to support model results. Model results indicated that structure size, background groundwater discharge rate, and sediment hydraulic conductivity are the most important factors determining the magnitude of induced hyporheic exchange, followed by geomorphic structure type, depth to bedrock, and channel slope. Model results indicated channel-spanning structures were more effective at driving hyporheic flow than were partially spanning structures, and weirs were more effective than were steps. Across most structure types, downwelling flux rate increased linearly with structure size, yet hyporheic residence time exhibited nonlinear behavior, increasing quickly with size at low structure sizes and declining thereafter. Important trends in model results were observed at the field site and also interpreted using simple hydraulic theory, thereby supporting the modeling approach and clarifying underlying processes.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 45 条
[21]  
Harvey J. W., 2000, Streams and Groundwaters, P3, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-012389845-6/50002-8
[22]   Solute uptake in aquatic sediments due to current-obstacle interactions [J].
Hutchinson, PA ;
Webster, IT .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1998, 124 (05) :419-426
[23]  
Jones J. B., 2000, STREAMS GROUND WATER
[24]   Geomorphic controls on hyporheic exchange flow in mountain streams [J].
Kasahara, T ;
Wondzell, SM .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2003, 39 (01) :3-1
[25]   Modeling surface and ground water mixing in the hyporheic zone using MODFLOW and MT3D [J].
Lautz, Laura K. ;
Siegel, Donald I. .
ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 2006, 29 (11) :1618-1633
[26]  
Leopold L. B., 1953, HYDRAULIC GEOMETRY S
[27]   POOL SPACING IN FOREST CHANNELS [J].
MONTGOMERY, DR ;
BUFFINGTON, JM ;
SMITH, RD ;
SCHMIDT, KM ;
PESS, G .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1995, 31 (04) :1097-1105
[28]  
Munson BR, 1994, FUNDAMENTALS FLUID M
[29]   Hyporheic exchange with gravel beds: Basic hydrodynamic interactions and bedform-induced advective flows [J].
Packman, A ;
Salehin, M ;
Zaramella, M .
JOURNAL OF HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING-ASCE, 2004, 130 (07) :647-656
[30]   Relative roles of stream flow and sedimentary conditions in controlling hyporheic exchange [J].
Packman, AI ;
Salehin, M .
HYDROBIOLOGIA, 2003, 494 (1-3) :291-297