Managing uncertainty in hydrological models using complementary models

被引:36
作者
Abebe, AJ [1 ]
Price, RK [1 ]
机构
[1] IHE Delft, Int Inst Infrastruct Hydraul & Environm Engn, NL-2601 DA Delft, Netherlands
来源
HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES | 2003年 / 48卷 / 05期
关键词
conceptual rainfall-runoff models; average mutual information; error modelling; complementary modelling; Sieve basin; Italy;
D O I
10.1623/hysj.48.5.679.51450
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Handling uncertainties in a conceptual rainfall runoff model is approached as an error modelling problem. The approach is based on the application of a parallel data-driven model that uses available measured data and previous model errors at specific time steps to forecast the errors of the conceptual model. The average mutual information technique is used to study the relationship between the different variables and the model errors at varying lag times. The resulting information is used to select the most related input data and the lead time at which they can be best applied in the error-forecast model. The method is applied to a conceptual rainfall-runoff model of the Sieve basin in Tuscany, Italy. Artificial neural network models trained to forecast the residuals of the conceptual model at lead times of 1-6 h are applied to forecast the errors and improve the subsequent flow forecasts. The research shows that using a parallel data-driven model to complement the conceptual model produces much better runoff predictions in comparison to using the conceptual model alone.
引用
收藏
页码:679 / 692
页数:14
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
ABEBE AJ, 2000, HYDROINFORMATICS 200
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1970, J Hydrol, V10, DOI [DOI 10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6, 10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1980, The Xinanjiang Model
[4]   THE FUTURE OF DISTRIBUTED MODELS - MODEL CALIBRATION AND UNCERTAINTY PREDICTION [J].
BEVEN, K ;
BINLEY, A .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 1992, 6 (03) :279-298
[5]   NEURAL NETWORKS AND THEIR APPLICATIONS [J].
BISHOP, CM .
REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 1994, 65 (06) :1803-1832
[6]   Artificial neural network approach to flood forecasting in the River Arno [J].
Campolo, M ;
Soldati, A ;
Andreussi, P .
HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL, 2003, 48 (03) :381-398
[7]   An artificial neural network approach to rainfall-runoff modelling [J].
Dawson, CW ;
Wilby, R .
HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES, 1998, 43 (01) :47-66
[8]   Physical interpretation and sensitivity analysis of the TOPMODEL [J].
Franchini, M ;
Wendling, J ;
Obled, C ;
Todini, E .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1996, 175 (1-4) :293-338
[9]   Global optimization techniques for the calibration of conceptual rainfall-runoff models [J].
Franchini, M ;
Galeati, G ;
Berra, S .
HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES, 1998, 43 (03) :443-458
[10]   COMPARATIVE-ANALYSIS OF SEVERAL CONCEPTUAL RAINFALL RUNOFF MODELS [J].
FRANCHINI, M ;
PACCIANI, M .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1991, 122 (1-4) :161-219