Influence of contrast agent dose and ultrasound exposure on cardiomyocyte injury induced by myocardial contrast echocardiography in rats

被引:57
作者
Miller, DL
Li, P
Dou, C
Gordon, D
Edwards, CA
Armstrong, WF
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Med Ctr, Dept Internal Med & Cardiol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Med Ctr, Dept Cell & Dev Biol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2371041467
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To detect specific cardiomyocyte injury induced by myocardial contrast material-enhanced echocardiography (ie, myocardial contrast echocardiography) in rats and to ascertain the influences of contrast material dose and ultrasound exposure on this injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All animal procedures were approved by the university committee for the use and care of animals. Myocardial contrast echocardiography with 1:4 electrocardiographic (ECG) triggering was performed at 1.5 MHz in 61 anesthetized rats. Evans blue (EB) dye was injected as the vital stain for cardiomyocyte injury. At the start of myocardial contrast echocardiography, which lasted 10 minutes, perflutren lipid microsphere-based contrast material was infused through the tail vein for 5 minutes. Premature heartbeats were counted from the ECG record. The numbers of EB-stained cells counted on sections of heart specimens obtained 24 hours after myocardial contrast echocardiography and then either fresh frozen or embedded in paraffin were determined by using fluorescence microscopy. Results were compared statistically by using t tests and Mann-Whitney rank sum tests. RESULTS: EB-stained cells were concentrated in the anterior region of the myocardium. In the paraffin-em bedded specimens, EB-stained cells were often accompanied by but largely separate from areas of inflammatory cell infiltration. At endsystolic triggering with a 50 mu L/kg dose of microsphere contrast material, the EB-stained cell count increased with increasing peak rarefactional pressure amplitude, with significantly increased cell counts at 1.6 MPa (P < .02) and 2.0 MPa (P < .005) relative to the cell counts at sham myocardial contrast echocardiography. Premature heartbeats had a similar exposure-response relationship; however, number of premature heartbeats and EB-stained cell count did not appear to be directly related (coefficient of determination r(2) = 0.03). The EB-stained cell counts at end-diastolic triggering were not significantly different from those at end-systolic triggering (P > .1). EB-stained cell counts increased with increasing contrast material dose, from 10 to 50 mu L/kg, at 2.0 MPa. CONCLUSION: Cardiomyocyte injury was induced by the interaction of ultrasound pulses with contrast agent microbubbles during myocardial contrast echocardiography in rats, and the numbers of injured cells increased with increasing contrast agent dose and ultrasound exposure. (c) RSNA, 2005.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 143
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Destruction of contrast microbubbles by ultrasound - Effects on myocardial function, coronary perfusion pressure, and microvascular integrity [J].
Ay, T ;
Havaux, X ;
Van Camp, G ;
Campanelli, B ;
Gisellu, G ;
Pasquet, A ;
Denef, JF ;
Melin, JA ;
Vanoverschelde, JLJ .
CIRCULATION, 2001, 104 (04) :461-466
[2]  
Becher H, 2000, HDB CONTRAST ECHOCAR
[3]   Ultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction can repeatedly direct highly specific plasmid expression to the heart [J].
Bekeredjian, R ;
Chen, SY ;
Frenkel, PA ;
Grayburn, PA ;
Shohet, RV .
CIRCULATION, 2003, 108 (08) :1022-1026
[4]   ISOPROTERENOL-INDUCED MYOCARDIAL FIBROSIS IN RELATION TO MYOCYTE NECROSIS [J].
BENJAMIN, IJ ;
JALIL, JE ;
TAN, LB ;
CHO, K ;
WEBER, KT ;
CLARK, WA .
CIRCULATION RESEARCH, 1989, 65 (03) :657-670
[5]   Does contrast echocardiography with Optison induce myocardial necrosis in humans? [J].
Borges, AC ;
Walde, T ;
Reibis, RK ;
Grohmann, A ;
Ziebig, R ;
Rutsch, W ;
Schimke, I ;
Baumann, G .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, 2002, 15 (10) :1080-1086
[6]  
Brinker Jeffrey, 2003, Rev Cardiovasc Med, V4 Suppl 5, pS19
[7]   Bioeffects of myocardial contrast microbubble destruction by echocardiography [J].
Chen, SY ;
Kroll, MH ;
Shohet, RV ;
Frenkel, P ;
Mayer, SA ;
Grayburn, PA .
ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY-A JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ULTRASOUND AND ALLIED TECHNIQUES, 2002, 19 (06) :495-500
[8]   Bioeffects of positive and negative acoustic pressures in mice infused with microbubbles [J].
Dalecki, D ;
Child, SZ ;
Raeman, CH ;
Xing, CC ;
Gracewski, S ;
Carstensen, EL .
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2000, 26 (08) :1327-1332
[9]   Mechanical bioeffects from diagnostic ultrasound: AIUM consensus statements - Introduction [J].
Fowlkes, JB ;
Holland, CK .
JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2000, 19 (02) :69-72
[10]  
FOWLKES JB, 2001, ULTRASOUND CONTRAST, P121