Gemcitabine Plus Docetaxel Versus Docetaxel in Patients With Predominantly Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Randomized, Phase III Study by the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group

被引:24
作者
Nielsen, Dorte L. [1 ]
Bjerre, Karsten D. [2 ]
Jakobsen, Erik H. [4 ]
Cold, Soren [5 ]
Stenbygaard, Lars [6 ]
Sorensen, Peter G. [7 ]
Kamby, Claus [3 ]
Moller, Susanne [2 ]
Jorgensen, Charlotte L. T.
Andersson, Michael [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Herlev Hosp, Dept Oncol, DK-2730 Herlev, Denmark
[2] Danish Breast Canc Cooperat Grp Registry, Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Univ Copenhagen, Rigshosp, Finsen Ctr, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Vejle Hosp, Vejle, Denmark
[5] Odense Univ Hosp, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark
[6] Aahus Univ Hosp, Aalborg Hosp, Aalborg, Denmark
[7] Roskilde Hosp, Roskilde, Denmark
关键词
ANTHRACYCLINE-PRETREATED PATIENTS; SINGLE-AGENT; SALVAGE CHEMOTHERAPY; LINE CHEMOTHERAPY; TRIAL; PACLITAXEL; THERAPY; ASSOCIATION; DOXORUBICIN; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2010.33.9507
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
Purpose The objective of this phase III study was to compare the efficacy of gemcitabine plus docetaxel (GD) versus docetaxel in patients with advanced breast cancer. Patients and Methods Predominantly human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) -negative patients were randomly assigned to gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2)) on days 1 and 8 plus docetaxel (75 mg/m(2)) on day 8 or to docetaxel (100 mg/m(2)) on day 1, every 21 days. Patients were untreated or had prior (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy or a single anthracycline-based chemotherapy regimen for metastatic breast cancer. The primary end point was time to progression (TTP), and secondary end points were overall survival (OS), response rate (RR), and toxicity. Results A total of 170 patients were allocated to GD, and 167 were allocated to docetaxel. Median TTP on GD was 10.3 months versus 8.3 months on docetaxel (hazard ratio [HR], 0.77; 95% CI, 0.59 to 1.01; log-rank P = .06). The adjusted Cox proportional model for TTP showed a significant difference favoring the combination (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.90; P = .007). However, RR was similar (GD, 36%; docetaxel, 34%), and OS was not different (P = .57). Grades 3 to 4 neutropenia was common (GD, 75%; docetaxel, 69%); infection was reported in 26% and 21% of patients in the GD and docetaxel groups, respectively. Grades 3 to 4 thrombocytopenia was more frequent with GD (GD, 16%; docetaxel, 0.6%), and peripheral neuropathy was higher with docetaxel (GD, 5%; docetaxel, 16%). Conclusion GD compared with docetaxel demonstrated increased TTP in metastatic breast cancer. However, RR and OS were similar. Thus, the addition of gemcitabine failed to demonstrate any clinically meaningful benefit when combined with docetaxel. J Clin Oncol 29: 4748-4754. (C) 2011 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
引用
收藏
页码:4748 / 4754
页数:7
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]
Gemcitabine plus paclitaxel versus paclitaxel monotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer and prior anthracycline treatment [J].
Albain, Kathy S. ;
Nag, Shona M. ;
Calderillo-Ruiz, German ;
Jordaan, Johann P. ;
Llombart, Antonio C. ;
Pluzanska, Anna ;
Rolski, Janusz ;
Melemed, Allen S. ;
Reyes-Vidal, Jose M. ;
Sekhon, Jagdev S. ;
Simms, Lorinda ;
O'Shaughnessy, Joyce .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 26 (24) :3950-3957
[2]
HER-2 overexpression/amplification and its interaction with taxane-based therapy in breast cancer [J].
Azambuja, E. ;
Durbecq, V. ;
Rosa, D. D. ;
Colozza, M. ;
Larsimont, D. ;
Piccart-Gebhart, M. ;
Cardoso, F. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2008, 19 (02) :223-232
[3]
Baselga J, 1997, Oncology (Williston Park), V11, P43
[4]
Gemcitabine as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer: A phase II trial [J].
Blackstein, M ;
Vogel, CL ;
Ambinder, R ;
Cowan, J ;
Iglesias, J ;
Melemed, A .
ONCOLOGY, 2002, 62 (01) :2-8
[5]
Novel association with gemcitabine and docetaxel as salvage chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracyclines: Results of a multicenter phase II study [J].
Brandi, M ;
Vici, P ;
Lopez, M ;
Valerio, MR ;
Giotta, F ;
Gebbia, N ;
Schittulli, F ;
Colucci, G .
SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY, 2004, 31 (02) :13-19
[6]
ADVANCED BREAST-CANCER - A PHASE-II TRIAL WITH GEMCITABINE [J].
CARMICHAEL, J ;
POSSINGER, K ;
PHILLIP, P ;
BEYKIRCH, M ;
KERR, H ;
WALLING, J ;
HARRIS, AL .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1995, 13 (11) :2731-2736
[7]
Single agent versus combination chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer [J].
Carrick, Sue ;
Parker, Sharon ;
Thornton, Charlene E. ;
Ghersi, Davina ;
Simes, John ;
Wilcken, Nicholas .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2009, (02)
[8]
Prospective randomized trial of docetaxel versus doxorubicin in patients with metastatic breast cancer [J].
Chan, S ;
Friedrichs, K ;
Noel, D ;
Pintér, T ;
Van Belle, S ;
Vorobiof, D ;
Duarte, R ;
Gil, MG ;
Bodrogi, I ;
Murray, E ;
Yelle, L ;
von Minckwitz, G ;
Korec, S ;
Simmonds, P ;
Buzzi, F ;
Mancha, RG ;
Richardson, G ;
Walpole, E ;
Ronzoni, M ;
Murawsky, M ;
Alakl, M ;
Riva, A ;
Crown, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (08) :2341-2354
[9]
Phase III Study of Gemcitabine Plus Docetaxel Compared With Capecitabine Plus Docetaxel for Anthracycline-Pretreated Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer [J].
Chan, Stephen ;
Romieu, Gilles ;
Huober, Jens ;
Delozier, Thierry ;
Tubiana-Hulin, Michele ;
Schneeweiss, Andreas ;
Lluch, Ana ;
Llombart, Antonio ;
du Bois, Andreas ;
Kreienberg, Rolf ;
Mayordomo, Jose Ignacio ;
Anton, Antonio ;
Harrison, Mark ;
Jones, Alison ;
Carrasco, Eva ;
Vaury, A. Thareau ;
Frimodt-Moller, Bente ;
Fumoleau, Pierre .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (11) :1753-1760
[10]
Beyond cytotoxic chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of HER2-negative, hormone-insensitive metastatic breast cancer: Current status and future opportunities [J].
Conlin, Alison K. ;
Seidman, Andrew D. .
CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2008, 8 (03) :215-223