Comparative analysis of algorithms for identifying amplifications and deletions in array CGH data

被引:289
作者
Lai, WR
Johnson, MD
Kucherlapati, R
Park, PJ
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Partners Ctr Genet & Genom, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Neurol Surg, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Childrens Hosp, Informat Program, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1093/bioinformatics/bti611
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Motivation: Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (CGH) can reveal chromosomal aberrations in the genomic DNA. These amplifications and deletions at the DNA level are important in the pathogenesis of cancer and other diseases. While a large number of approaches have been proposed for analyzing the large array CGH datasets, the relative merits of these methods in practice are not clear. Results: We compare 11 different algorithms for analyzing array CGH data. These include both segment detection methods and smoothing methods, based on diverse techniques such as mixture models, Hidden Markov Models, maximum likelihood, regression, wavelets and genetic algorithms. We compute the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves using simulated data to quantify sensitivity and specificity for various levels of signal-to-noise ratio and different sizes of abnormalities. We also characterize their performance on chromosomal regions of interest in a real dataset obtained from patients with Glioblastoma Multiforme. While comparisons of this type are difficult due to possibly sub-optimal choice of parameters in the methods, they nevertheless reveal general characteristics that are helpful to the biological investigator.
引用
收藏
页码:3763 / 3770
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2004, STAT APPL GENET MOL
  • [2] CGH-Plotter: MATLAB toolbox for CGH-data analysis
    Autio, R
    Hautaniemi, S
    Kauraniemi, P
    Yli-Harja, O
    Astola, J
    Wolf, M
    Kallioniemi, A
    [J]. BIOINFORMATICS, 2003, 19 (13) : 1714 - 1715
  • [3] Chromosomal localization of DNA amplifications in neuroblastoma tumors using cDNA microarray comparative genomic hybridization
    Beheshti, B
    Braude, I
    Marrano, P
    Thorner, P
    Zielenska, M
    Squire, JA
    [J]. NEOPLASIA, 2003, 5 (01): : 53 - 62
  • [4] High-resolution genome-wide mapping of genetic alterations in human glial brain tumors
    Bredel, M
    Bredel, C
    Juric, D
    Harsh, GR
    Vogel, H
    Recht, LD
    Sikic, BI
    [J]. CANCER RESEARCH, 2005, 65 (10) : 4088 - 4096
  • [5] High-resolution global profiling of genomic alterations with long oligonucleotide microarray
    Brennan, C
    Zhang, YY
    Leo, C
    Feng, B
    Cauwels, C
    Aguirre, AJ
    Kim, MJ
    Protopopov, A
    Chin, L
    [J]. CANCER RESEARCH, 2004, 64 (14) : 4744 - 4748
  • [6] ROBUST LOCALLY WEIGHTED REGRESSION AND SMOOTHING SCATTERPLOTS
    CLEVELAND, WS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1979, 74 (368) : 829 - 836
  • [7] A versatile statistical analysis algorithm to detect genome copy number variation
    Daruwala, RS
    Rudra, A
    Ostrer, H
    Lucito, R
    Wigler, M
    Mishra, B
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2004, 101 (46) : 16292 - 16297
  • [8] Quantile smoothing of array CGH data
    Eilers, PHC
    de Menezes, RX
    [J]. BIOINFORMATICS, 2005, 21 (07) : 1146 - 1153
  • [9] Hidden Markov models approach to the analysis of array CGH data
    Fridlyand, J
    Snijders, AM
    Pinkel, D
    Albertson, DG
    Jain, AN
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS, 2004, 90 (01) : 132 - 153
  • [10] Genome scanning with array CGH delineates regional alterations in mouse islet carcinomas
    Hodgson G.
    Hager J.H.
    Volik S.
    Hariono S.
    Wernick M.
    Moore D.
    Albertson D.G.
    Pinkel D.
    Collins C.
    Hanahan D.
    Gray J.W.
    [J]. Nature Genetics, 2001, 29 (4) : 459 - 464