The Association of Biomolecular Resource Facilities Proteomics Research Group 2006 Study - Relative protein quantitation

被引:86
作者
Turck, Christoph W.
Falick, Arnold M.
Kowalak, Jeffrey A.
Lane, William S.
Lilley, Kathryn S.
Phinney, Brett S.
Weintraub, Susan T.
Witkowska, H. Ewa
Yates, Nathan A.
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Psychiat, D-80804 Munich, Germany
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Howard Hughes Med Inst, Mass Spectrometry Lab, Dept Mol & Cell Biol, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[3] NIMH, Lab Neurotoxicol, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[4] Harvard Univ, Dept Mol & Cellular Biol, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[5] Univ Cambridge, Dept Biochem, Cambridge CB2 1QW, England
[6] Univ Cambridge, Cambridge Ctr Proteom, Cambridge CB2 1QW, England
[7] Univ Calif Davis, Genome Ctr, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[8] Univ Texas, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Biochem, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
[9] Univ Calif San Francisco, Biomol Resource Ctr Mass Spectemetry Facility, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[10] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Cell & Tissue Biol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[11] Merck & Co Inc, Merck Res Labs, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
关键词
MASS-SPECTROMETRY; GEL-ELECTROPHORESIS; DIFFERENCE;
D O I
10.1074/mcp.M700165-MCP200
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The determination of differences in relative protein abundance is a critical aspect of proteomics research that is increasingly used to answer diverse biological questions. The Association of Biomolecular Resource Facilities Proteomics Research Group 2006 study was a quantitative proteomics project in which the aim was to determine the identity and the relative amounts of eight proteins in two mixtures. There are numerous methodologies available to study the relative abundance of proteins between samples, but to date, there are few examples of studies that have compared these different approaches. For the 2006 Proteomics Research Group study, there were 52 participants who used a wide variety of gel electrophoresis, HPLC-, and mass spectrometry-based methods for relative quantitation. The quantitative data arising from this study were evaluated along with several other experimental details relevant to the methodologies used.
引用
收藏
页码:1291 / 1298
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Arnott D P, 2002, J Biomol Tech, V13, P179
[2]  
Arnott David, 2007, J Biomol Tech, V18, P124
[3]  
Arnott David, 2003, J Biomol Tech, V14, P205
[4]  
Beardsley RL, 2000, RAPID COMMUN MASS SP, V14, P2147, DOI 10.1002/1097-0231(20001215)14:23<2147::AID-RCM145>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-M
[6]  
COTTINGHAM K, 2006, J PROTEOME RES, V5, P740
[7]   ELECTROSPRAY IONIZATION FOR MASS-SPECTROMETRY OF LARGE BIOMOLECULES [J].
FENN, JB ;
MANN, M ;
MENG, CK ;
WONG, SF ;
WHITEHOUSE, CM .
SCIENCE, 1989, 246 (4926) :64-71
[8]   Quantitative proteomics analysis of the secretory pathway [J].
Gilchrist, Annalyn ;
Au, Catherine E. ;
Hiding, Johan ;
Bell, Alexander W. ;
Fernandez-Rodriguez, Julia ;
Lesimple, Souad ;
Nagaya, Hisao ;
Roy, Line ;
Gosline, Sara J. C. ;
Hallett, Michael ;
Paiement, Jacques ;
Kearney, Robert E. ;
Nilsson, Tommy ;
Bergeron, John J. M. .
CELL, 2006, 127 (06) :1265-1281
[9]   The basics of mass spectrometry in the twenty-first century [J].
Glish, GL ;
Vachet, RW .
NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY, 2003, 2 (02) :140-150
[10]   LASER DESORPTION IONIZATION OF PROTEINS WITH MOLECULAR MASSES EXCEEDING 10000 DALTONS [J].
KARAS, M ;
HILLENKAMP, F .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1988, 60 (20) :2299-2301