Effects of a common transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) protocol on motor evoked potentials found to be highly variable within individuals over 9 testing sessions

被引:83
作者
Horvath, Jared Cooney [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Vogrin, Simon J. [2 ,3 ]
Carter, Olivia [1 ]
Cook, Mark J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Forte, Jason D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Sch Psychol Sci, Redmond Barry Bldg, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, St Vincents Hosp, Dept Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, St Vincents Hosp, Dept Neurol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Grad Sch Educ, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS); Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS); Motor evoked potentials (MEPs); Longitudinal; Reliability; NONINVASIVE BRAIN-STIMULATION; MAGNETIC STIMULATION; ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGICAL-BASIS; CORTEX STIMULATION; HEALTHY-SUBJECTS; MENSTRUAL-CYCLE; EXCITABILITY; VARIABILITY; PLASTICITY;
D O I
10.1007/s00221-016-4667-8
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 [神经生物学];
摘要
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) uses a weak electric current to modulate neuronal activity. A neurophysiologic outcome measure to demonstrate reliable tDCS modulation at the group level is transcranial magnetic stimulation engendered motor evoked potentials (MEPs). Here, we conduct a study testing the reliability of individual MEP response patterns following a common tDCS protocol. Fourteen participants (7m/7f) each underwent nine randomized sessions of 1 mA, 10 min tDCS (3 anode; 3 cathode; 3 sham) delivered using an M1/orbito-frontal electrode montage (sessions separated by an average of similar to 5.5 days). Fifteen MEPs were obtained prior to, immediately following and in 5 min intervals for 30 min following tDCS. TMS was delivered at 130 % resting motor threshold using neuronavigation to ensure consistent coil localization. A number of non-experimental variables were collected during each session. At the individual level, considerable variability was seen among different testing sessions. No participant demonstrated an excitatory response aeyen20 % to all three anodal sessions, and no participant demonstrated an inhibitory response aeyen20 % to all three cathodal sessions. Intra-class correlation revealed poor anodal and cathodal test-retest reliability [anode: ICC(2,1) = 0.062; cathode: ICC(2,1) = 0.055] and moderate sham test-retest reliability [ICC(2,1) = 0.433]. Results also revealed no significant effect of tDCS at the group level. Using this common protocol, we found the effects of tDCS on MEP amplitudes to be highly variable at the individual level. In addition, no significant effects of tDCS on MEP amplitude were found at the group level. Future studies should consider utilizing a more strict experimental protocol to potentially account for intra-individual response variations.
引用
收藏
页码:2629 / 2642
页数:14
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]
AMASSIAN VE, 1987, NEUROSURGERY, V20, P148
[2]
FOCAL STIMULATION OF HUMAN CEREBRAL-CORTEX WITH THE MAGNETIC COIL - A COMPARISON WITH ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION [J].
AMASSIAN, VE ;
CRACCO, RQ ;
MACCABEE, PJ .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1989, 74 (06) :401-416
[3]
Non-synaptic mechanisms underlie the after-effects of cathodal transcutaneous direct current stimulation of the human brain [J].
Ardolino, G ;
Bossi, B ;
Barbieri, S ;
Priori, A .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2005, 568 (02) :653-663
[4]
Differentiation of Motor Cortical Representation of Hand Muscles by Navigated Mapping of Optimal TMS Current Directions in Healthy Subjects [J].
Bashir, Shahid ;
Perez, Jennifer M. ;
Horvath, Jared C. ;
Pascual-Leone, Alvaro .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2013, 30 (04) :390-395
[5]
Differential Modulation of Corticospinal Excitability by Different Current Densities of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation [J].
Bastani, Andisheh ;
Jaberzadeh, Shapour .
PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (08)
[6]
A Higher Number of TMS-Elicited MEP from a Combined Hotspot Improves Intra- and Inter-Session Reliability of the Upper Limb Muscles in Healthy Individuals [J].
Bastani, Andisheh ;
Jaberzadeh, Shapour .
PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (10)
[7]
Partially non-linear stimulation intensity-dependent effects of direct current stimulation on motor cortex excitability in humans [J].
Batsikadze, G. ;
Moliadze, V. ;
Paulus, W. ;
Kuo, M. -F. ;
Nitsche, M. A. .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2013, 591 (07) :1987-2000
[8]
Electrode montages for tDCS and weak transcranial electrical stimulation: Role of "return" electrode's position and size [J].
Bikson, M. ;
Datta, Abhishek ;
Rahman, Asif ;
Scaturro, Jen .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2010, 121 (12) :1976-1978
[9]
Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation suppresses ipsilateral projections to presumed propriospinal neurons of the proximal upper limb [J].
Bradnam, Lynley V. ;
Stinear, Cathy M. ;
Byblow, Winston D. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2011, 105 (05) :2582-2589
[10]
TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING OF THE HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX WITH MAGNETIC STIMULATION - FACTORS AFFECTING ACCURACY AND REPRODUCIBILITY [J].
BRASILNETO, JP ;
MCSHANE, LM ;
FUHR, P ;
HALLETT, M ;
COHEN, LG .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1992, 85 (01) :9-16