Bacteriophage therapy to reduce Campylobacter jejuni colonization of broiler chickens

被引:268
作者
Carrillo, CL [1 ]
Atterbury, RJ [1 ]
El-Shibiny, A [1 ]
Connerton, PL [1 ]
Dillon, E [1 ]
Scott, A [1 ]
Connerton, IF [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Sch Biosci, Div Food Sci, Loughborough LE12 5RD, Leics, England
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1128/AEM.71.11.6554-6563.2005
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Colonization of broiler chickens by the enteric pathogen Campylobacter jejuni is widespread and difficult to prevent. Bacteriophage therapy is one possible means by which this colonization could be controlled, thus limiting the entry of campylobacters into the human food chain. Prior to evaluating the efficacy of phage therapy, experimental models of Campylobacter colonization of broiler chickens were established by using low-passage C. jejuni isolates HPC5 and GIIC8 from United Kingdom broiler flocks. The screening of 53 lytic bacteriophage isolates against a panel of 50 Campylobacter isolates from broiler chickens and 80 strains isolated after human infection identified two phage candidates with broad host lysis. These phages, CP8 and CP34, were orally administered in antacid suspension, at different dosages, to 25-day-old broiler chickens experimentally colonized with the C. jejuni broiler isolates. Phage treatment of C. jejuni-colonized birds resulted in Campylobacter counts failing between 0.5 and 5 log(10) CFU/g of cecal contents compared to untreated controls over a 5-day period postadministration. These reductions were dependent on the phage-Campylobacter combination, the dose of phage applied, and the time elapsed after administration. Campylobacters resistant to bacteriophage infection were recovered from phage-treated chickens at a frequency of <4%. These resistant types were compromised in their ability to colonize experimental chickens and rapidly reverted to a phage-sensitive phenotype in vivo. The selection of appropriate phage and their dose optimization are key elements for the success of phage therapy to reduce campylobacters in broiler chickens.
引用
收藏
页码:6554 / 6563
页数:10
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
Adams M. H., 1959, BACTERIOPHAGES
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1983, Statistical methods
[3]   Application of host-specific bacteriophages to the surface of chicken skin leads to a reduction in recovery of Campylobacter jejuni [J].
Atterbury, RJ ;
Connerton, PL ;
Dodd, CER ;
Rees, CED ;
Connerton, IF .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2003, 69 (10) :6302-6306
[4]   Isolation and characterization of Campylobacter Bacteriophages from retail poultry [J].
Atterbury, RJ ;
Connerton, PL ;
Dodd, CER ;
Rees, CED ;
Connerton, IF .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2003, 69 (08) :4511-4518
[5]   Use of lytic bacteriophage for control of experimental Escherichia coli septicemia and meningitis in chickens and calves [J].
Barrow, P ;
Lovell, M ;
Berchieri, A .
CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC LABORATORY IMMUNOLOGY, 1998, 5 (03) :294-298
[6]   The use of bacteriophages for treatment and prevention of bacterial disease in animals and animal models of human infection [J].
Barrow, PA .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2001, 76 (07) :677-682
[7]   COLONIZATION OF GASTROINTESTINAL TRACTS OF CHICKS BY CAMPYLOBACTER-JEJUNI [J].
BEERY, JT ;
HUGDAHL, MB ;
DOYLE, MP .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1988, 54 (10) :2365-2370
[8]   THE ACTIVITY IN THE CHICKEN ALIMENTARY-TRACT OF BACTERIOPHAGES LYTIC FOR SALMONELLA-TYPHIMURIUM [J].
BERCHIERI, A ;
LOVELL, MA ;
BARROW, PA .
RESEARCH IN MICROBIOLOGY, 1991, 142 (05) :541-549
[9]   Longitudinal study of Campylobacter jejuni bacteriophages and their hosts from broiler chickens [J].
Connerton, PL ;
Carrillo, CML ;
Swift, C ;
Dillon, E ;
Scott, A ;
Rees, CED ;
Dodd, CER ;
Frost, J ;
Connerton, IF .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2004, 70 (07) :3877-3883
[10]   Salmonella, Campylobacter and Escherichia coli O157:H7 decontamination techniques for the future [J].
Corry, JEL ;
James, C ;
James, SJ ;
Hinton, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 1995, 28 (02) :187-196