Classification and Management of the Unstable Total Hip Arthroplasty

被引:94
作者
Wera, Glenn D. [1 ]
Ting, Nick T. [2 ]
Moric, Mario [3 ]
Paprosky, Wayne G. [2 ]
Sporer, Scott M. [2 ]
Della Valle, Craig J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Case Western Reserve Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Cleveland, OH 44116 USA
[2] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[3] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
关键词
hip dislocation; instability; revision; constrained liner; CONSTRAINED ACETABULAR COMPONENTS; LOW-FRICTION ARTHROPLASTY; RECURRENT DISLOCATION; FEMORAL-HEAD; POSTERIOR DISLOCATION; OVERUSE SYNDROME; UNITED-STATES; FOLLOW-UP; REVISION; REPLACEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2011.09.010
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
100224 [整形外科学];
摘要
Seventy-five total hip arthroplasty revisions for instability were classified into 6 primary etiologies: I, acetabular component malposition; II, femoral component malposition; III, abductor deficiency; IV, impingement; V. late wear; or VI, unresolved etiology. The most common etiologies were cup malposition (type I; 33%) and abductor deficiency (type III; 36%). At a mean of 35.3 months, 11 redislocations occurred (14.6%). Acetabular revisions were protective against redislocation (P < .015). The number of previous operations (P = .0379) and previously failed constrained liners (P < .02) were risk factors for failure. Tripolar constrained liners demonstrated improved survivorship vs locking ring types (P < .02); cemented constrained liners failed more often than modular constrained liners (P < .0018). The highest risk of failure was in patients with abductor insufficiency with revisions for other etiologies having a success rate of 90%.
引用
收藏
页码:710 / 715
页数:6
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]
AMSTUTZ HC, 2004, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT RE, V108
[2]
Anderson M J, 1994, J Arthroplasty, V9, P17, DOI 10.1016/0883-5403(94)90133-3
[3]
Treatment of recurrent dislocation of total hip arthroplasty using a ligament prosthesis [J].
Barbosa, JK ;
Khan, AM ;
Andrew, JG .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2004, 19 (03) :318-321
[4]
COMPLICATIONS RELATED TO MODULARITY OF TOTAL HIP COMPONENTS [J].
BARRACK, RL ;
BURKE, DW ;
COOK, SD ;
SKINNER, HB ;
HARRIS, WH .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1993, 75 (05) :688-692
[5]
The effect of femoral component head size on posterior dislocation of the artificial hip joint [J].
Bartz, RL ;
Noble, PC ;
Kadakia, NR ;
Tullos, HS .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2000, 82A (09) :1300-1307
[6]
Jumbo femoral head for the treatment of recurrent dislocation following total hip replacement [J].
Beaule, PE ;
Schmalzried, TP ;
Udomkiat, P ;
Amstutz, HC .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2002, 84A (02) :256-263
[7]
Effect of femoral head diameter and operative approach on risk of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty [J].
Berry, DJ ;
Von Knoch, M ;
Schleck, CD ;
Harmsen, WS .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2005, 87A (11) :2456-2463
[8]
The dislocating hip - What to do, what to do [J].
Bourne, RB ;
Mehin, R .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2004, 19 (04) :111-114
[9]
The Epidemiology of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty in the United States [J].
Bozic, Kevin J. ;
Kurtz, Steven M. ;
Lau, Edmund ;
Ong, Kevin ;
Vail, Thomas P. ;
Berry, Daniel J. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2009, 91A (01) :128-133
[10]
Use of constrained acetabular components for hip instability: An average 10-year follow-up study [J].
Bremner, BRB ;
Goetz, DD ;
Callaghan, JJ ;
Capello, WN ;
Johnston, RC .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2003, 18 (07) :131-137