Lotka-Volterra competition models for sessile organisms

被引:16
作者
Spencer, Matthew [1 ]
Tanner, Jason E. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Liverpool, Sch Biol Sci, Liverpool L69 3BX, Merseyside, England
[2] Univ Adelaide, SARDI Aquat Sci, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[3] Univ Adelaide, Sch Earth & Environm Sci, Adelaide, SA, Australia
关键词
coral reefs; Lotka-Volterra competition; Markov models; maximum likelihood; statistical modeling;
D O I
10.1890/07-0941.1
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Markov models are widely used to describe the dynamics of communities of sessile organisms, because they are easily fitted to field data and provide a rich set of analytical tools. In typical ecological applications, at any point in time, each point in space is in one of a finite set of states ( e. g., species, empty space). The models aim to describe the probabilities of transitions between states. In most Markov models for communities, these transition probabilities are assumed to be independent of state abundances. This assumption is often suspected to be false and is rarely justified explicitly. Here, we start with simple assumptions about the interactions among sessile organisms and derive a model in which transition probabilities depend on the abundance of destination states. This model is formulated in continuous time and is equivalent to a Lotka-Volterra competition model. We fit this model and a variety of alternatives in which transition probabilities do not depend on state abundances to a long-term coral reef data set. The Lotka-Volterra model describes the data much better than all models we consider other than a saturated model ( a model with a separate parameter for each transition at each time interval, which by definition fits the data perfectly). Our approach provides a basis for further development of stochastic models of sessile communities, and many of the methods we use are relevant to other types of community. We discuss possible extensions to spatially explicit models.
引用
收藏
页码:1134 / 1143
页数:10
相关论文
共 62 条
[51]   Sensitivity analysis of Markov models for communities of competing sessile organisms [J].
Spencer, Matthew .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 2006, 75 (04) :1024-1033
[52]   Model selection in phylogenetics [J].
Sullivan, J ;
Joyce, P .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY EVOLUTION AND SYSTEMATICS, 2005, 36 :445-466
[53]   Models of open populations with space-limited recruitment in stochastic environments:: relative importance of recruitment and survival in populations of Semibalanus balanoides [J].
Svensson, CJ ;
Jenkins, SR ;
Hawkins, SJ ;
Myers, AA ;
Range, P ;
Paula, J ;
O'Riordan, RM ;
Åberg, P .
MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 2004, 275 :185-197
[54]   SPECIES COEXISTENCE, KEYSTONE SPECIES, AND SUCCESSION - A SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS [J].
TANNER, JE ;
HUGHES, TP ;
CONNELL, JH .
ECOLOGY, 1994, 75 (08) :2204-2219
[55]   The role of history in community dynamics: A modelling approach [J].
Tanner, JE ;
Hughes, TP ;
Connell, JH .
ECOLOGY, 1996, 77 (01) :108-117
[56]   A unified framework for modelling wildlife population dynamics [J].
Thomas, L ;
Buckland, ST ;
Newman, KB ;
Harwood, J .
AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF STATISTICS, 2005, 47 (01) :19-34
[57]   MARKOVIAN APPROACHES TO ECOLOGICAL SUCCESSION [J].
USHER, MB .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 1979, 48 (02) :413-426
[58]  
Wilson WG, 1996, B MATH BIOL, V58, P907
[59]   Markov chain models predict the consequences of experimental extinctions [J].
Wootton, JT .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2004, 7 (08) :653-660
[60]   Causes of species diversity differences: a comparative analysis of Markov models [J].
Wootton, JT .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2001, 4 (01) :46-56