Cholinesterase inhibitors for patients with Alzheimer's disease: systematic review of randomised clinical trials

被引:353
作者
Kaduszkiewicz, H [1 ]
Zimmermann, T [1 ]
Beck-Bornholdt, HP [1 ]
van den Bussche, H [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Ctr Psychosocial Med, Dept Primary Med Care, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
来源
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2005年 / 331卷 / 7512期
关键词
D O I
10.1136/bmj.331.7512.321
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives Pharmacological treatment of Alzheimer's disease focuses on correcting the cholinergic deficiency in the central nervous system with cholinesterase inhibitors. Three cholinesterase inhibitors are currently recommended: donepezil, rivastigmine, and galantamine. This review assessed the scientific evidence for the recommendation of these agents. Data sources The terms "donepezil", "rivastigmine", and "galantamine", limited by "randomized-controlled-trials" were searched in Medline (1989-November 2004), Embase (1989-November 2004), and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews without restriction for language. Study selection All published, double blind, randomised controlled trials examining efficacy on the basis of clinical outcomes, in which treatment with donepezil, rivastigmine, or galantamine was compared with placebo in patients with Alzheimer's disease, were included. Each study was assessed independently, following a predefined checklist of criteria of methodological quality. Results 22 trials met the inclusion criteria. Follow-up ranged from six weeks to three years. 12 of 14 studies measuring the cognitive outcome by means of the 70 point Alzheimer's disease assessment scale-cognitive subscale showed differences ranging from 1.5 points to 3.9 points in favour of the respective cholinesterase inhibitors. Benefits were also reported from all 12 trials that used the clinician's interview based impression of change scale with input from caregivers. Methodological assessment of all studies found considerable flaws-for example, multiple testing without correction for multiplicity or exclusion of patients after randomisation. Conclusion Because of flawed methods and small clinical benefits, the scientific basis for recommendations of cholinesterase inhibitors for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease is questionable.
引用
收藏
页码:321 / 323
页数:5
相关论文
共 42 条
[11]  
*FDA, 1989, PER CENTR NERV SYST, P227
[12]   A 24-week, randomized, double-blind study of donepezil in moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease [J].
Feldman, H ;
Gauthier, S ;
Hecker, J ;
Vellas, B ;
Subbiah, P ;
Whalen, E .
NEUROLOGY, 2001, 57 (04) :613-620
[13]  
FLORACK C, 2002, OFFIZIELLES MITTEILU, P1
[14]   A phase II study in patients with Alzheimer's disease to assess the preliminary efficacy and maximum tolerated dose of rivastigmine (Exelon®) [J].
Forette, F ;
Anand, R ;
Gharabawi, G .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 1999, 6 (04) :423-429
[15]  
FRITZE J, 2005, PSYCHONEUROENDOCRINO, V31, P46
[16]   Donepezil therapy in clinical practice -: A randomized crossover study [J].
Greenberg, SM ;
Tennis, MK ;
Brown, LB ;
Gomez-Isla, T ;
Hayden, DL ;
Schoenfeld, DA ;
Walsh, KL ;
Corwin, C ;
Daffner, KR ;
Friedman, P ;
Meadows, ME ;
Sperling, RA ;
Growdon, JH .
ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, 2000, 57 (01) :94-99
[17]  
GUY W, 1976, ECDEU ASSESSMENT MAN, P207
[18]   The efficacy of donepezil in the treatment of neuropsychiatric symptoms in Alzheimer disease [J].
Holmes, C ;
Wilkinson, D ;
Dean, C ;
Vethanayagam, S ;
Olivieri, S ;
Langley, A ;
Pandita-Gunawardena, ND ;
Hogg, F ;
Clare, C ;
Damms, J .
NEUROLOGY, 2004, 63 (02) :214-219
[19]   Clinical efficacy and safety of donepezil on cognitive and global function in patients with Alzheimer's disease - A 24-week, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in Japan [J].
Homma, A ;
Takeda, M ;
Imai, Y ;
Udaka, F ;
Hasegawa, K ;
Kameyama, M ;
Nishimura, T .
DEMENTIA AND GERIATRIC COGNITIVE DISORDERS, 2000, 11 (06) :299-313
[20]  
MCKHANN G, 1984, NEUROLOGY, V34, P939, DOI 10.1212/WNL.34.7.939