Comparison of spirometric-gated and -ungated HRCT in COPD

Purpose: The purpose of this work was to evaluate feasibility of spirometric-gated high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and to compare the lung density CT measurements obtained with and without spirometric control of lung volume. Method: Twenty-nine patients with COPD underwent pulmonary function tests and spirometric-gated Q slices at 10% and 90% of vital capacity) and -ungated (12 slices at maximum expiration and inspiration) HRCT in the same day. Four lung density measurements (inspiratory pixel index, expiratory pixel index, inspiratory and expiratory mean lung density) derived from gated and ungated acquisitions were compared using the nonparametric Wilcoxon test, the line of equality, and the Bland and Altman test. Results: The vital capacity measured at pulmonary function tests and on the CT table showed a substantial agreement. All but one patient completed the gated and ungated examination, but only 8 (28%) of 28 patients reached the expiratory and inspiratory gating level for CT acquisitions at the first attempt. Only the inspiratory mean lung density derived from the 3 gated and 12 ungated slices showed borderline agreement. Other CT measurements, and notably all those from the 3 gated and ungated scans, acquired at the same anatomic level, did not agree. Conclusions: Although the procedure can be difficult for individual patients, spirometric gating significantly influences the lung density CT measurements and might improve standardization of CT evaluation of COPD.