Fuel switching in slum and non-slum households in urban India

被引:50
作者
Ahmad, Sohail [1 ,2 ]
Puppim de Oliveira, Jose A. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] United Nations Univ Inst Adv Study Sustainabil UN, Shibuya Ku, Tokyo 1508925, Japan
[2] Tokyo Inst Technol, Grad Sch Decis Sci & Technol, Tokyo 152, Japan
[3] Getulio Vargas Fdn FGV, Brazilian Sch Publ & Business Adm EBAPE, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Cooking energy; Fuel switching; LPG; Slum; India; CO-BENEFITS; ENERGY USE; COOKING; CHOICE; PREFERENCES; COMBUSTION; CLIMATE; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.072
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Improving access to modern fuels is essential in developing countries for reducing adverse human health and environmental impacts caused by traditional fuels. Fuels use in developing countries is heterogeneous across households. This paper estimates drivers of fuel switching in non-slum and slum households in urban India, using a discrete choice model on a nationally representative micro data. The choices considered are three categories of cooking fuels: traditional firewood, dung, crop residue and coal/charcoal; modern kerosene and liquefied petroleum gas (LPG); and mixed fuels. The results suggest that the patterns of fuels use are consistent with the energy ladder theory in urban India. In addition to income, the major determinants of modern fuels uptake are fuels prices, access to electricity and water supply, and education attainment. The increasing price of LPG affects the willingness to change fuels for low-income non-slum and the high-income slum households negatively. The analyses make a strong case for applying differential subsidies on modern fuels employing multidimensional aspects of poverty. Moreover, there is a need for partial diversion of existing fuels subsidies on improving physical and social capitals, which will result in uptake of modern fuels, particularly among disadvantaged communities. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:130 / 136
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[11]   HOUSEHOLD FUEL CHOICE IN ZIMBABWE - AN EMPIRICAL-TEST OF THE ENERGY LADDER HYPOTHESIS [J].
HOSIER, RH ;
DOWD, J .
RESOURCES AND ENERGY, 1987, 9 (04) :347-361
[12]   Fuel choice in developing countries: Evidence from Bolivia [J].
Israel, D .
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND CULTURAL CHANGE, 2002, 50 (04) :865-890
[13]   A smoke-free kitchen: initiating community based co-production for cleaner cooking and cuts in carbon emissions [J].
Jerneck, Anne ;
Olsson, Lennart .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2013, 60 :208-215
[14]   Three dimensional energy profile: A conceptual framework for assessing household energy use [J].
Kowsari, Reza ;
Zerriffi, Hisham .
ENERGY POLICY, 2011, 39 (12) :7505-7517
[15]  
Long Scott., 2006, Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata, V3rd
[16]   From linear fuel switching to multiple cooking strategies: A critique and alternative to the energy ladder model [J].
Masera, OR ;
Saatkamp, BD ;
Kammen, DM .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2000, 28 (12) :2083-2103
[17]  
McMichael A., 2000, SPECIAL REPORT METHO, P329
[18]  
Moreno E.L., 2003, Slums of the world: The face of urban poverty in the new millennium?: Monitoring the millennium development goal, target 11--world-wide slum dweller estimation
[19]  
NBO, 2010, REP COMM SLUM STAT C
[20]   Household energy preferences for cooking in urban Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso [J].
Ouedraogo, Boukary .
ENERGY POLICY, 2006, 34 (18) :3787-3795