An investigation of concurrent ERP and self-paced reading methodologies

被引:63
作者
Ditman, Tali
Holcomb, Phillip J.
Kuperberg, Gina R.
机构
[1] Tufts Univ, Dept Psychol, Medford, MA 02155 USA
[2] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Psychiat, Charlestown, MA USA
[3] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Athinoula A Martinos Ctr Biomed Imaging, Charlestown, MA USA
关键词
event-related potentials; self-paced reading; P600; N400; language; sentence; methodology;
D O I
10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00593.x
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Traditionally, event-related brain potential (ERP) studies of language processing have presented words at a fixed rate using rapid serial visual presentation. Recent studies suggest, however, that the processes engaged during sentence comprehension are contingent on word presentation rate. These findings underscore the importance of allowing participants to read at a natural pace. The present study employed simultaneous self- paced reading and ERP methodologies to examine behavioral and neural responses while participants read sentences containing pragmatic or morphosyntactic violations or no violations. ERP and self-paced reading results replicated previous findings. This novel combination of behavioral and ERP methodologies combines the high temporal resolution and direct neural measures offered by ERPs with the more natural reading environment and information about processing load provided by self- paced reading.
引用
收藏
页码:927 / 935
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Processing new and repeated names: Effects of coreference on repetition priming with speech and fast RSVP [J].
Camblin, C. Christine ;
Ledoux, Kerry ;
Boudewyn, Megan ;
Gordon, Peter C. ;
Swaab, Tamara Y. .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 2007, 1146 :172-184
[2]   Differences in the perception and time course of syntactic and semantic violations [J].
De Vincenzi, M ;
Job, R ;
Di Matteo, R ;
Angrilli, A ;
Penolazzi, B ;
Ciccarelli, L ;
Vespignani, F .
BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 2003, 85 (02) :280-296
[3]   THE INDEPENDENCE OF SYNTACTIC PROCESSING [J].
FERREIRA, F ;
CLIFTON, C .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1986, 25 (03) :348-368
[4]   ON METHODS IN THE ANALYSIS OF PROFILE DATA [J].
GREENHOUSE, SW ;
GEISSER, S .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1959, 24 (02) :95-112
[5]   Concerning the automaticity of syntactic processing [J].
Gunter, TC ;
Friederici, AD .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1999, 36 (01) :126-137
[6]  
Haberlandt K., 1994, HDB PSYCHOLINGUISTIC, P1
[7]   COMPONENT PROCESSES IN TEXT COMPREHENSION AND SOME OF THEIR INTERACTIONS [J].
HABERLANDT, KF ;
GRAESSER, AC .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1985, 114 (03) :357-374
[8]   Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations [J].
Hagoort, P .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2003, 15 (06) :883-899
[9]   THE SYNTACTIC POSITIVE SHIFT (SPS) AS AN ERP MEASURE OF SYNTACTIC PROCESSING [J].
HAGOORT, P ;
BROWN, C ;
GROOTHUSEN, J .
LANGUAGE AND COGNITIVE PROCESSES, 1993, 8 (04) :439-483
[10]   SEMANTIC PRIMING AND STIMULUS DEGRADATION - IMPLICATIONS FOR THE ROLE OF THE N400 IN LANGUAGE PROCESSING [J].
HOLCOMB, PJ .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1993, 30 (01) :47-61