Effects of implant healing time on crestal bone loss of a controlled-load dental implant

被引:27
作者
Ko, CC
Douglas, WH
DeLong, R
Rohrer, MD
Swift, JQ
Hodges, JS
An, KN
Ritman, EL
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Dept Oral Sci, MDRCBB, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Dept Oral Sci, Div Oral Pathol, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[3] Univ Minnesota, Maxillofacial Surg Div, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[4] Univ Minnesota, Div Biostat, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[5] Univ Minnesota, Sch Dent, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[6] Mayo Clin, Orthopaed Biomech Lab, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[7] Mayo Clin & Mayo Grad Sch Med, Dept Physiol & Biophys, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
关键词
dental implant; early loading; crestal bone loss; biomechanics; micro-CT; TITANIUM IMPLANTS; EXTERNAL FIXATION; STRAIN; INTERFACE; MONKEYS; MASS;
D O I
10.1177/154405910308200803
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
100302 [口腔临床医学];
摘要
The universally accepted concept of delay-loaded dental implants has recently been challenged. This study hypothesizes that early loading (decreased implant healing time) leads to increased bone formation and decreased crestal bone loss. We used 17 minipigs to study implants under a controlled load, with non-loaded implants for comparison. Radiographic and histological assessments were made of the osseointegrated bone changes for 3 healing times (between implant insertion and loading), following 5 months of loading. The effect of loading on crestal bone loss depended on the healing time. Early loading preserved the most crestal bone. Delayed loading had significantly more crestal bone loss compared with the non-loaded controls (2.4 mm vs. 0.64 mm; P < 0.05). The histological assessment and biomechanical analyses of the healing bone suggested that loading and bioactivities of osteoblasts exert a synergistic effect on osseointegration that is likely to support the hypothesis that early loading produces more favorable osseointegration.
引用
收藏
页码:585 / 591
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]
ARO HT, 1990, SURG ROUNDS ORTHOP, V4, P43
[2]
Branemark P I, 1999, Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, V1, P2, DOI 10.1111/j.1708-8208.1999.tb00086.x
[3]
INFLUENCE OF FUNCTIONAL USE OF ENDOSSEOUS DENTAL IMPLANTS ON THE TISSUE-IMPLANT INTERFACE .1. HISTOLOGICAL ASPECTS [J].
BRUNSKI, JB ;
MOCCIA, AF ;
POLLACK, SR ;
KOROSTOFF, E ;
TRACHTENBERG, DI .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1979, 58 (10) :1953-1969
[4]
BRUNSKI JB, 1989, BIOMEDICAL MAT DEVIC, P505
[5]
CHANG MC, 2003, IN PRESS J BIOMECH
[6]
CHAO EYS, 1989, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P24
[7]
Biologic width around titanium implants. A histometric analysis of the implanto-gingival junction around unloaded and loaded nonsubmerged implants in the canine mandible [J].
Cochran, DL ;
Hermann, JS ;
Schenk, RK ;
Higginbottom, FL ;
Buser, D .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 1997, 68 (02) :186-197
[8]
Fontijn-Tekamp FA, 1998, J DENT RES, V77, P1832
[9]
FROST HM, 1983, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P286
[10]
THE EFFECT OF EXTERNAL FIXATION STIFFNESS ON EARLY HEALING OF TRANSVERSE OSTEOTOMIES [J].
GILBERT, JA ;
DAHNERS, LE ;
ATKINSON, MA .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 1989, 7 (03) :389-397