Altered cytoplasmic-to-nuclear ratio of survivin is a prognostic indicator in breast cancer

被引:74
作者
Brennan, Donal J. [1 ]
Rexhepaj, Elton [1 ]
O'Brien, Sallyann L. [1 ]
McSherry, Elaine [1 ]
O'Connor, Darran P. [1 ]
Fagan, Ailis [2 ]
Culhane, Aedin C. [4 ]
Higgins, Desmond G. [2 ]
Jirstrom, Karin [4 ]
Millikan, Robert C. [5 ]
Landberg, Goran [4 ]
Duffy, Michael J. [2 ,3 ]
Hewitt, Stephen M. [6 ]
Gallaghe, William M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll Dublin, Sch Biomol & Biomed Sci, Conway Inst, Dublin 4, Ireland
[2] Univ Coll Dublin, Sch Med & Med Sci, Dublin 4, Ireland
[3] St Vincents Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Dublin 4, Ireland
[4] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat & Computat Biol, Dana Farber Canc Inst, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] Univ N Carolina, Dept Epidemiol, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[6] NCI, NIH, Ctr Canc Res, Tissue Array Res Program,Lab Pathol, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1760
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Survivin (BIRC5) is a promising tumor biomarker. Conflicting data exist on its prognostic effect in breast cancer. These data may at least be partly due to the manual interpretation of immunohistochemical staining, especially as survivin can be located in both the nucleus and cytoplasm. Quantitative determination of survivin expression using image analysis offers the opportunity to develop alternative scoring models for survivin immunohistochemistry. Here, we present such a model. Experimental Design: A breast cancer tissue microarray containing 102 tumors was stained with an anti-survivin antibody. Whole-slide scanning was used to capture high-resolution images. These images were analyzed using automated algorithms to quantify the staining. Results: Increased nuclear, but not cytoplasmic, survivin was associated with a reduced overall survival (OS; P = 0.038) and disease-specific survival (P = 0.0015). A high cytoplasmicto-nuclear ratio (CNR) of survivin was associated with improved OS (P = 0.005) and disease-specific survival (P = 0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that the survivin CNR was an independent predictor of CIS (hazard ratio, 0.09; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.76; P = 0.027). A survivin CNR of >5 correlated positively with estrogen receptor (P = 0.019) and progesterone receptor (P = 0.033) levels, whereas it was negatively associated with Ki-67 expression (P = 0.04), p53 status (P = 0.005), and c-myc amplification (P = 0.016). Conclusion: Different prognostic information is supplied by nuclear and cytoplasmic survivin in breast cancer. Nuclear survivin is a poor prognostic marker in breast cancer. Moreover, CNR of survivin, as determined by image analysis, is an independent prognostic factor.
引用
收藏
页码:2681 / 2689
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
[21]   Control of apoptosis and mitotic spindle checkpoint by survivin [J].
Li, FZ ;
Ambrosini, G ;
Chu, EY ;
Plescia, J ;
Tognin, S ;
Marchisio, PC ;
Altieri, DC .
NATURE, 1998, 396 (6711) :580-584
[22]   The cyclin D1 high and cyclin E high subgroups of breast cancer:: separate pathways in tumorogenesis based on pattern of genetic aberrations and inactivation of the pRb node [J].
Lodén, M ;
Stighall, M ;
Nielsen, HN ;
Roos, G ;
Emdin, SO ;
Östlund, H ;
Landberg, G .
ONCOGENE, 2002, 21 (30) :4680-4690
[23]   CENP-F expression is associated with poor prognosis and chromosomal instability in patients with primary breast cancer [J].
O'Brien, Sallyarm L. ;
Fagan, Ailis ;
Fox, Edward J. P. ;
Millikan, Robert C. ;
Culhane, Aedin C. ;
Brennan, Donal J. ;
McCann, Amanda H. ;
Hegarty, Shauna ;
Moyna, Siobhan ;
Duffy, Michael J. ;
HigginS, Desmond G. ;
Jirstrom, Karin ;
Landberg, Goran ;
Gallagher, William M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2007, 120 (07) :1434-1443
[24]   Lack of prognostic significance of survivin, survivin-ΔEx3, survivin-2B, galectin-3, bag-1, bax-α and MRP-1 rnRNAs in breast cancer [J].
O'Driscoll, L ;
Linehan, R ;
Kennedy, SM ;
Cronin, D ;
Purcell, R ;
Glynn, S ;
McDermott, EW ;
Hill, AD ;
O'Higgins, NJ ;
Parkinson, M ;
Clynes, M .
CANCER LETTERS, 2003, 201 (02) :225-236
[25]   A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer [J].
Paik, S ;
Shak, S ;
Tang, G ;
Kim, C ;
Baker, J ;
Cronin, M ;
Baehner, FL ;
Walker, MG ;
Watson, D ;
Park, T ;
Hiller, W ;
Fisher, ER ;
Wickerham, DL ;
Bryant, J ;
Wolmark, N .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 351 (27) :2817-2826
[26]  
Roos G, 1998, INT J CANCER, V79, P343, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19980821)79:4<343::AID-IJC6>3.0.CO
[27]  
2-V
[28]   Survivin expression in breast cancer predicts clinical outcome and is associated with HER2, VEGF, urokinase plasminogen activator and PAI-1 [J].
Ryan, BM ;
Konecny, GE ;
Kahlert, S ;
Wang, HJ ;
Untch, M ;
Meng, G ;
Pegram, MD ;
Podratz, KC ;
Crown, J ;
Slamon, DJ ;
Duffy, MJ .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2006, 17 (04) :597-604
[29]   Tumor specific VEGF-A and VEGFR2/KDR protein are co-expressed in breast cancer [J].
Rydén, L ;
Linderholm, B ;
Nielsen, NH ;
Emdin, S ;
Jönsson, PE ;
Landberg, G .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2003, 82 (03) :147-154
[30]   The chromosomal passenger complex is required for chromatin-induced microtubule stabilization and spindle assembly [J].
Sampath, SC ;
Ohi, R ;
Leismann, O ;
Salic, A ;
Pozniakovski, A ;
Funabiki, H .
CELL, 2004, 118 (02) :187-202