Pursuing the method of multiple working hypotheses for hydrological modeling

被引:279
作者
Clark, Martyn P. [1 ]
Kavetski, Dmitri [2 ]
Fenicia, Fabrizio [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Natl Ctr Atmospher Res, Res Applicat Lab, Boulder, CO 80307 USA
[2] Univ Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
[3] Ctr Rech Publ Gabriel Lippmann, Dept Environm & Agrobiotechnol, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
[4] Delft Univ Technol, Water Resources Sect, NL-2600 AA Delft, Netherlands
关键词
RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELS; LAND-SURFACE SCHEMES; SOIL-MOISTURE; DATA ASSIMILATION; DOWNWARD APPROACH; WATER-BALANCE; HESS-OPINIONS; PROCESS CONCEPTUALIZATION; PROCESS REPRESENTATION; UNIFYING FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1029/2010WR009827
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Ambiguities in the representation of environmental processes have manifested themselves in a plethora of hydrological models, differing in almost every aspect of their conceptualization and implementation. The current overabundance of models is symptomatic of an insufficient scientific understanding of environmental dynamics at the catchment scale, which can be attributed to difficulties in measuring and representing the heterogeneity encountered in natural systems. This commentary advocates using the method of multiple working hypotheses for systematic and stringent testing of model alternatives in hydrology. We discuss how the multiple-hypothesis approach provides the flexibility to formulate alternative representations (hypotheses) describing both individual processes and the overall system. When combined with incisive diagnostics to scrutinize multiple model representations against observed data, this provides hydrologists with a powerful and systematic approach for model development and improvement. Multiple-hypothesis frameworks also support a broader coverage of the model hypothesis space and hence improve the quantification of predictive uncertainty arising from system and component nonidentifiabilities. As part of discussing the advantages and limitations of multiple-hypothesis frameworks, we critically review major contemporary challenges in hydrological hypothesis-testing, including exploiting different types of data to investigate the fidelity of alternative process representations, accounting for model structure ambiguities arising from major uncertainties in environmental data, quantifying regional differences in dominant hydrological processes, and the grander challenge of understanding the self-organization and optimality principles that may functionally explain and describe the heterogeneities evident in most environmental systems. We assess recent progress in these research directions, and how new advances are possible using multiple-hypothesis methodologies.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 169 条
[81]   Land information system: An interoperable framework for high resolution land surface modeling [J].
Kumar, S. V. ;
Peters-Lidard, C. D. ;
Tian, Y. ;
Houser, P. R. ;
Geiger, J. ;
Olden, S. ;
Lighty, L. ;
Eastman, J. L. ;
Doty, B. ;
Dirmeyer, P. ;
Adams, J. ;
Mitchell, K. ;
Wood, E. F. ;
Sheffield, J. .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2006, 21 (10) :1402-1415
[82]   Using interactive recession curve analysis to specify a general catchment storage model [J].
Lamb, Robert ;
Beven, Keith .
HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 1997, 1 (01) :101-113
[83]   GPS Multipath and Its Relation to Near-Surface Soil Moisture Content [J].
Larson, Kristine M. ;
Braun, John J. ;
Small, Eric E. ;
Zavorotny, Valery U. ;
Gutmann, Ethan D. ;
Bilich, Andria L. .
IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATIONS AND REMOTE SENSING, 2010, 3 (01) :91-99
[84]   Can we measure snow depth with GPS receivers? [J].
Larson, Kristine M. ;
Gutmann, Ethan D. ;
Zavorotny, Valery U. ;
Braun, John J. ;
Williams, Mark W. ;
Nievinski, Felipe G. .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2009, 36
[85]   Parameterization Improvements and Functional and Structural Advances in Version 4 of the Community Land Model [J].
Lawrence, David M. ;
Oleson, Keith W. ;
Flanner, Mark G. ;
Thornton, Peter E. ;
Swenson, Sean C. ;
Lawrence, Peter J. ;
Zeng, Xubin ;
Yang, Zong-Liang ;
Levis, Samuel ;
Sakaguchi, Koichi ;
Bonan, Gordon B. ;
Slater, Andrew G. .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS, 2011, 3
[86]   How can rainfall-runoff models handle intercatchment groundwater flows? Theoretical study based on 1040 French catchments [J].
Le Moine, Nicolas ;
Andreassian, Vazken ;
Perrin, Charles ;
Michel, Claude .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2007, 43 (06)
[87]   A modular approach to addressing model design, scale, and parameter estimation issues in distributed hydrological modelling [J].
Leavesley, GH ;
Markstrom, SL ;
Restrepo, PJ ;
Viger, RJ .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2002, 16 (02) :173-187
[88]   A SIMPLE HYDROLOGICALLY BASED MODEL OF LAND-SURFACE WATER AND ENERGY FLUXES FOR GENERAL-CIRCULATION MODELS [J].
Liang, X ;
LETTENMAIER, DP ;
WOOD, EF ;
BURGES, SJ .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1994, 99 (D7) :14415-14428
[89]   A new parameterization for surface and groundwater interactions and its impact on water budgets with the variable infiltration capacity (VIC) land surface model [J].
Liang, X ;
Xie, ZH ;
Huang, MY .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2003, 108 (D16)
[90]   Noah LSM Snow Model Diagnostics and Enhancements [J].
Livneh, Ben ;
Xia, Youlong ;
Mitchell, Kenneth E. ;
Ek, Michael B. ;
Lettenmaier, Dennis P. .
JOURNAL OF HYDROMETEOROLOGY, 2010, 11 (03) :721-738