Proposal for revision of the TNM classification system for renal cell carcinoma

被引:65
作者
Ficarra, V
Guillè, F
Schips, L
de la Taille, A
Galetti, TP
Tostain, J
Cindolo, L
Novara, G
Zigeuner, R
Bratti, E
Li, GR
Altieri, V
Abbou, CC
Zanolla, L
Artibani, W
Patard, JJ
机构
[1] Univ Verona, Dept Urol, I-37100 Verona, Italy
[2] Univ Rennes, Dept Urol, Rennes, France
[3] Graz Univ, Dept Urol, Graz, Austria
[4] CHU Henri Mondor, Dept Urol, F-94010 Creteil, France
[5] Univ Padua, Dept Urol, Padua, Italy
[6] CHU St Etienne, Dept Urol, St Etienne, France
[7] Univ Naples Federico II, Dept Urol, Naples, Italy
[8] Univ Verona, Dept Cardiol, I-37100 Verona, Italy
关键词
localized renal cell carcinoma; TNM classification system; nephron-sparing surgery; radial nephrectomy; partial nephrectomy; martingale residuals analysis;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.21465
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
BACKGROUND. The current study defined an optimal tumor size breakpoint to stratify localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC) into groups with significantly different cancer-related outcomes and proposed a revision of the TNM classification system. METHODS. The authors analyzed the data from 1138 patients who had undergone partial or radical nephrectomy for localized RCC at 7 European urologic centers. The optimal pathologic size breakpoint was calculated using the martingale residuals from a Cox proportional hazards regression model. RESULTS. The mean follow-up time was 87 months. The scatterplot of tumor size versus expected risk of death per patient suggested that an interval of 5-6 cm was appropriate. A total of 720 (63.3%) and 418 (36.7%) patients had tumors measuring <= 5.5-cm and tumors measuring > 5.5-cm, respectively. Significant cancer-specific survival differences between the two groups of patients were reported in the series by all the centers participating in the study. On univariate analysis, the other variables found to be associated with cancer-specific survival were the patient's age, symptomatic tumor presentation, and the Fuhrman nuclear grade. On multivariate analysis, the pathologic stage of the primary tumor defined according to the 5.5-cm breakpoint was found to be an independent predictor of cancer-specific survival, as well as age, mode of presentation, and nuclear grade. According to the multivariate analysis, the authors clustered patients into 3 groups with statistically significant outcome differences: 1) patients with <= 5.5-cm incidentally detected RCC; 2) patients with <= 5.5-cm symptomatic RCC) and 3) patients with > 5.5-cm RCC. This cancer-related outcome stratification was valid regardless of the patient's age. CONCLUSIONS. The 5.5-cm breakpoint was found to be the optimal tumor size breakpoint with which to stratify patients with organ-confined RCC. The study supported the upgrade of the TNM classification system according to this breakpoint. (c) 2005 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:2116 / 2123
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]
Efficacy of nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma: Analysis based on the new 1997 tumor-node-metastasis staging system [J].
Belldegrun, A ;
Tsui, KH ;
deKernion, JB ;
Smith, RB .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (09) :2868-2875
[2]
Stage pT1 conventional (clear cell) renal cell carcinoma: Pathological features associated with cancer specific survival [J].
Cheville, JC ;
Blute, ML ;
Zincke, H ;
Lohse, CM ;
Weaver, AL .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (02) :453-456
[3]
A preoperative clinical prognostic model for non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma [J].
Cindolo, L ;
de la Taille, A ;
Messina, G ;
Romis, L ;
Abbou, CC ;
Altieri, V ;
Rodriguez, A ;
Patard, JJ .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 92 (09) :901-905
[4]
Prognostic importance of tumor size for localized conventional (clear cell) renal cell carcinoma - Assessment of TNM T1 and T2 tumor categories and comparison with other prognostic parameters [J].
Delahunt, B ;
Kittelson, JM ;
McCredie, MRE ;
Reeve, AE ;
Stewart, JH ;
Bilous, AM .
CANCER, 2002, 94 (03) :658-664
[5]
Reassessment of the 1997 TNM classification system for renal cell carcinoma - A 5-cm T1/T2 cutoff is a better predictor of clinical outcome [J].
Elmore, JM ;
Kadesky, KT ;
Koeneman, KS ;
Sagalowsky, AI .
CANCER, 2003, 98 (11) :2329-2334
[6]
Neoplasm staging and organ-confined renal cell carcinoma: A systematic review [J].
Ficarra, V ;
Novara, G ;
Galfano, A ;
Artibani, W .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2004, 46 (05) :559-564
[7]
Ficarra V, 2004, UROLOGY, V63, P235, DOI 10.1016/j.urology.2003.09.081
[8]
Incidental detection beyond pathological factors as prognostic predictor of renal cell carcinoma [J].
Ficarra, V ;
Prayer-Galetti, T ;
Novella, G ;
Bratti, E ;
Maffei, N ;
Dal Bianco, M ;
Artibani, W ;
Pagano, F .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2003, 43 (06) :663-669
[9]
An outcome prediction model for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma treated with radical nephrectomy based on tumor stage, size, grade and necrosis: The SSIGN score [J].
Frank, I ;
Blute, ML ;
Cheville, JC ;
Lohse, CM ;
Weaver, AL ;
Zincke, H .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 168 (06) :2395-2400
[10]
PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE OF MORPHOLOGIC PARAMETERS IN RENAL-CELL CARCINOMA [J].
FUHRMAN, SA ;
LASKY, LC ;
LIMAS, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 1982, 6 (07) :655-663