Sex selection: Treating different cases differently

被引:33
作者
Dickens, BM
Serour, GI
Cook, RJ
Qiu, RZ
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Fac Law, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Fac Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Joint Ctr Bioeth, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Al Azhar Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Cairo, Egypt
[5] Al Azhar Univ, Int Islam Ctr Populat Studies & Res, Cairo, Egypt
[6] Chinese Acad Sci, Peking Union Med Coll, Res Ctr Bioeth, Beijing, Peoples R China
[7] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Philosophy, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
sex selection; sex discrimination; sperm sorting; preimplantation genetic diagnosis; abortion; discrimination against girl children; discrimination against women;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijgo.2005.05.001
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
This paper contrasts ethical approaches to sex selection in countries where discrimination against women is pervasive, resulting in selection against girt children, and in countries where there is less general discrimination and couples do not prefer children of either sex. National sex ratio imbalances where discrimination against women is common have resulted in laws and policies, such as in India and China, to deter and prevent sex selection. Birth ratios of children can be affected by techniques of prenatal sex determination and abortion, preconception sex selection and discarding disfavored embryos, and prefertitization sperm sorting, when disfavored sperm remain unused. Incentives for son preference are reviewed, and taws and policies to prevent sex selection are explained. The elimination of social, economic and other discrimination against women is urged to redress sex selection against girt children. Where there is no general selection against girt children, sex selection can be allowed to assist families that want children of both sexes. (c) 2005 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 177
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Land relations under unbearable stress: Rwanda caught in the Malthusian trap [J].
Andre, C ;
Platteau, JP .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 1998, 34 (01) :1-47
[2]  
BATZOFIN JH, 1987, UROL CLIN N AM, V14, P609
[3]  
CARSON SA, 1988, FERTIL STERIL, V50, P16
[4]  
*CHIN AC SOC SCI I, 2004, ACT REC CORR BIRTH S
[5]   Ethics, legal, social, counselling - Attitudes towards preconception sex selection: a representative survey from Germany [J].
Dahl, E ;
Hinsch, KD ;
Brosig, B ;
Beutel, M .
REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2004, 9 (06) :600-603
[6]   Preconception sex selection for non-medical reasons: a representative survey from Germany [J].
Dahl, E ;
Beutel, M ;
Brosig, B ;
Hinsch, KD .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2003, 18 (10) :2231-2234
[7]   Can sex selection be ethically tolerated? [J].
Dickens, BM .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2002, 28 (06) :335-336
[8]  
EPSTEIN I, 1948, BABYLONIAN TALMUD, P217
[9]   The girl child [J].
Fathalla, MF .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2000, 70 (01) :7-12
[10]  
FATHALLA MF, 1997, OBSTET GYNECOL, P122