A unified view of imaging the elastic properties of tissue

被引:91
作者
Parker, KJ
Taylor, LS
Gracewski, S
Rubens, DJ
机构
[1] Univ Rochester, Sch Engn & Appl Sci, Rochester, NY 14627 USA
[2] Univ Rochester, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1121/1.1880772
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
A number of different approaches have been developed to estimate and image the elastic properties of tissue. The biomechanical properties of tissues are vitally linked to function and pathology, but cannot be directly assessed by conventional ultrasound, MRI, CT, or nuclear imaging. Research developments have introduced new approaches, using either MRI or ultrasound to image the tissue response to some stimulus. A wide range of stimuli has been evaluated, including heat, water jets, vibration shear waves, compression, and quasistatic compression, using single or multiple steps or low-frequency (<10 Hz) cyclic excitation. These may seem to be greatly dissimilar, and appear to produce distinctly different types of information and images. However, our purpose in this tutorial is to review the major classes of excitation stimuli, and then to demonstrate that they produce responses that fall within a common spectrum of elastic behavior. Within this spectrum, the major classes of excitation include step compression, cyclic quasistatic compression, harmonic shear wave excitation, and transient shear wave excitation. The information they reveal about the unknown elastic distribution within an imaging region of interest are shown to be fundamentally related because the tissue responses are governed by the same equation. Examples use simple geometry to emphasize the common nature of the approaches. (c) 2005 Acoustical Society of America.
引用
收藏
页码:2705 / 2712
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Achenbach J. D., 1984, WAVE PROPAGATION ELA
[2]  
BRENDEL B, 2003, P 2 INT C ULTR MEAS, V2, P69
[3]   A solution to diffraction biases in sonoelasticity: The acoustic impulse technique [J].
Catheline, S ;
Wu, F ;
Fink, M .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1999, 105 (05) :2941-2950
[4]  
Chaturvedi P, 1998, Med Image Anal, V2, P325, DOI 10.1016/S1361-8415(98)80014-5
[5]   Thresholds for detecting and characterizing focal lesions using steady-state MR elastography [J].
Doyley, MM ;
Weaver, JB ;
Van Houten, EEW ;
Kennedy, FE ;
Paulsen, KD .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (04) :495-504
[6]   A freehand elastographic imaging approach for clinical breast imaging: System development and performance evaluation [J].
Doyley, MM ;
Bamber, JC ;
Fuechsel, F ;
Bush, NL .
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2001, 27 (10) :1347-1357
[7]   Application of radiation force in noncontact measurement of the elastic parameters [J].
Fatemi, M ;
Greenleaf, JF .
ULTRASONIC IMAGING, 1999, 21 (02) :147-154
[8]   Ultrasound-stimulated vibro-acoustic spectrography [J].
Fatemi, M ;
Greenleaf, JF .
SCIENCE, 1998, 280 (5360) :82-85
[9]   Imaging of the elastic properties of tissue - A review [J].
Gao, L ;
Parker, KJ ;
Lerner, RM ;
Levinson, SF .
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1996, 22 (08) :959-977
[10]   SONOELASTICITY IMAGING - THEORY AND EXPERIMENTAL-VERIFICATION [J].
GAO, L ;
PARKER, KJ ;
ALAM, SK ;
LERNER, RM .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1995, 97 (06) :3875-3886