Professional vs. amateur judgment accuracy:: The case of foreign exchange rates

被引:41
作者
Önkal, D
Yates, JF
Simga-Mugan, C
Öztin, S
机构
[1] Bilkent Univ, Fac Business Adm, TR-06533 Bilkent, Turkey
[2] Univ Michigan, Sch Business, Dept Psychol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Sumerbank AS, TR-06533 Ankara, Turkey
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0749-5978(03)00058-X
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Highly knowledgeable people often fail to achieve highly accurate judgments, a phenomenon sometimes called the "process-performance paradox." The present research tested for this paradox in foreign exchange (FX) rate forecasting. Forty professional and 57 sophisticated amateur forecasters made one-day and one-week-ahead FX predictions in deterministic and probabilistic formats. Among the conclusions indicated by the results are: (a) professional accuracy usually surpasses amateur accuracy, although many amateurs outperform many professionals; (b) professionals appear to achieve high proficiency via heavy reliance on predictive information (unlike what has been observed before, e.g., for stock prices); (c) forecast format strongly affects judgment accuracy and processes; and (d) apparent overconfidence can transform itself into underconfidence depending on when and how forecasters must articulate their confidence. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 185
页数:17
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Alpert M., 1982, JUDGMENT UNCERTAINTY, P294, DOI [DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511809477.022, 10.1017/CBO9780511809477.022]
[2]  
Armstrong JS, 2001, INT SER OPER RES MAN, V30, P443
[3]   ERROR MEASURES FOR GENERALIZING ABOUT FORECASTING METHODS - EMPIRICAL COMPARISONS [J].
ARMSTRONG, JS ;
COLLOPY, F .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 1992, 8 (01) :69-80
[4]  
Brier G.W., 1950, Monthly Weather Review, V78, P1
[5]  
Camerer C. F., 1997, Research on Judgment and Decision Making: Currents, Connections and Controversies
[6]   Decomposed versus holistic estimates of effort required for software writing tasks [J].
Connolly, T ;
Dean, D .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1997, 43 (07) :1029-1045
[7]   ROBUST BEAUTY OF IMPROPER LINEAR-MODELS IN DECISION-MAKING [J].
DAWES, RM .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1979, 34 (07) :571-582
[8]   EXPERT-NOVICE JUDGMENTS AND NEW CUE SETS - PROCESS VERSUS OUTCOME [J].
ENIS, CR .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 16 (04) :641-662
[9]   PROBABILISTIC MENTAL MODELS - A BRUNSWIKIAN THEORY OF CONFIDENCE [J].
GIGERENZER, G ;
HOFFRAGE, U ;
KLEINBOLTING, H .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1991, 98 (04) :506-528
[10]  
Kendall M. G., 1948, RANK CORRELATION MET