Coronal plane stability before and after total knee arthroplasty

被引:34
作者
Siston, Robert A.
Goodman, Stuart B.
Delp, Scott L.
Giori, Nicholas J.
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Scott Lab E318, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Dept Bioengn, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[4] Stanford Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[5] Palo Alto Vet Affairs Hlth Care Syst, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Palo Alto, CA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/BLO.0b013e318137a182
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The success of total knee arthroplasty depends in part on proper soft tissue management to achieve a stable joint. It is unknown to what degree total knee arthroplasty changes joint stability. We used a surgical navigation system to intraoperatively measure joint stability in 24 patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty to address two questions: (1) Is the total arc of varus-valgus motion after total knee arthroplasty different from the arc of varus-valgus motion in an osteoarthritic knee? (2) Does total knee arthroplasty produce equal amounts of varus/valgus motion (ie, is the knee "balanced")? We observed no difference between the total arc of varus-valgus motion before and after total knee arthroplasty; the total amount of motion was unchanged. On average, osteoarthritic knees were "unbalanced" but were "balanced" after prosthesis implantation. We found a negative correlation between the relative amount of varus/valgus motion in extension before and after prosthesis implantation in extension and a positive correlation between how well the knees were balanced after prosthesis implantation in extension and in flexion. Our data suggest immediately after implantation knees retain a greater than normal amount of varus-valgus motion, but this motion is more evenly distributed. Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 49
页数:7
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]
ANOUCHI YS, 1993, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V287, P170
[2]
ARIMA J, 1998, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V353, P194
[3]
Alignment in total knee arthroplasty -: A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique [J].
Bäthis, H ;
Perlick, L ;
Tingart, M ;
Lüring, C ;
Zurakowski, D ;
Grifka, J .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2004, 86B (05) :682-687
[4]
BEPLLEMANS J, 2006, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V452, P49
[5]
Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique -: A randomised, prospective trial [J].
Chauhan, SK ;
Scott, RG ;
Breidahl, W ;
Beaver, RJ .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2004, 86B (03) :372-377
[6]
A computational model of postoperative knee kinematics [J].
Chen, E ;
Ellis, RE ;
Bryant, JT ;
Rudan, JF .
MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS, 2001, 5 (04) :317-330
[7]
CLAYTON ML, 1986, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P117
[8]
Delp SL, 1998, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P49
[9]
Three-dimensional morphology and kinematics of the distal part of the femur viewed in virtual reality - Part II [J].
Eckhoff, DG ;
Bach, JM ;
Spitzer, VM ;
Reinig, KD ;
Bagur, MM ;
Baldini, TH ;
Rubinstein, D ;
Humphries, S .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2003, 85A :97-104
[10]
Rotational malalignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty [J].
Fehring, TK .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2000, (380) :72-79