A nonlinear SDP approach to fixed-order controller synthesis and comparison with two other methods applied to an active suspension system

被引:19
作者
Hol, CWJ [1 ]
Scherer, CW [1 ]
van der Meché, EG [1 ]
Bosgra, OH [1 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Syst & Control Grp, NL-2628 CD Delft, Netherlands
关键词
fixed-order; H(infinity); control; interior-point; optimality conditions; SDP; CONTROL DESIGN; PERFORMANCE; ALGORITHMS; REDUCTION;
D O I
10.3166/ejc.9.13-28
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
080201 [机械制造及其自动化];
摘要
The computation of optimal H(infinity) controllers with a prescribed order is motivated by real-time implementation on systems with a very high sampling rate. In this paper, we present a nonlinear SDP approach to the H(infinity) fixed-order synthesis problem. The algorithm is an extension of a primal predictor corrector method to nonconvex problems. To avoid wrong step directions the usual Newton steps in the corrector are replaced by a curved line-search. The predictor steps are based on Dikin elliposids of a "convexified" domain. The method converges, under mild conditions, to a point that satisfies the first-order necessary conditions. We derived conditions to check second-order optimality in terms of the original SDP problem. We compared the method with two other methods for fixed-order control: a posteriori reduction and the cone complementarity method. We computed for all three methods sixth-order controllers for a 27th order plant of an active suspension system. The interior point method computes a controller which has slightly larger closed-loop H(infinity)-norm than the full order controller. Results of experiments show that the controller computed with the interior point method practically achieved the control objectives.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 28
页数:16
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]
APAKRIAN P, 2002, 0213 MATH DEP
[2]
BENNER P, 2000, SFB3930005 TU CHEMN
[3]
Beran E, 1997, P AMER CONTR CONF, P81, DOI 10.1109/ACC.1997.611759
[4]
Bonnans J.F., 2013, PERTURBATION ANAL OP
[5]
A cone complementarity linearization algorithm for static output-feedback and related problems [J].
ElGhaoui, L ;
Oustry, F ;
AitRami, M .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1997, 42 (08) :1171-1176
[6]
ELGHAOUI L, 1994, IEEE DECIS CONTR P, P2678, DOI 10.1109/CDC.1994.411398
[7]
SEMI-DEFINITE MATRIX CONSTRAINTS IN OPTIMIZATION [J].
FLETCHER, R .
SIAM JOURNAL ON CONTROL AND OPTIMIZATION, 1985, 23 (04) :493-513
[8]
Optimality conditions for nonconvex semidefinite programming [J].
Forsgren, A .
MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING, 2000, 88 (01) :105-128
[9]
GEROMEL JC, 1994, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1994 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-3, P40
[10]
Controller approximation:: Approaches for preserving H∞ performance [J].
Goddard, PJ ;
Glover, K .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1998, 43 (07) :858-871