Advance directives for research: Ethical problems and responses

被引：28

作者：

Moorhouse, A ^{[1
]}

Weisstub, DN ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] UNIV MONTREAL,FAC MED,MONTREAL,PQ H3C 3J6,CANADA

来源：

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW AND PSYCHIATRY | 1996年 / 19卷 / 02期

基金：

英国医学研究理事会;

关键词：

D O I：

10.1016/0160-2527(96)00001-5

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

[No abstract available]

引用

页码：107 / 141

页数：35

共 44 条

[1]

[Anonymous], 1993, INT ETH GUID BIOM RE

[2]

[Anonymous], 1962, Utilitarianism, liberty, representative government

[3]

BENTHAM J, 1948, FRAGMENTS GOVT INTRO

[4]

BRANDT R, 1959, ETHICAL THEORY

[5]

BURNETT J, 1982, WORKS PLATO

[6]

CALLAHAN D, 1987, SETTING LIMITS MED G, P177

[7] A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY OF ADVANCE DIRECTIVES FOR LIFE-SUSTAINING CARE [J].

DANIS, M ;

SOUTHERLAND, LI ;

GARRETT, JM ;

SMITH, JL ;

HIELEMA, F ;

PICKARD, CG ;

EGNER, DM ;

PATRICK, DL .

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1991, 324 (13) :882-888

[8]

DOWNIE J, 1992, HLTH LAW REV CANADA, V12, P23

[9]

Hare R.M., 1963, Freedom and Reason

[10]

HIGH DM, 1994, HASTINGS CTR REP S16, V24, P6

← 1 2 3 4 5 →