Subjective value determines initial dominance in binocular rivalry

被引:43
作者
Balcetis, Emily [1 ]
Dunning, David [2 ]
Granot, Yael [1 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Dept Psychol, New York, NY 10003 USA
[2] Cornell Univ, Dept Psychol, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Motivation; Reward; New look; Visual perception; Binocular rivalry; PERCEPTUAL DEFENSE; FACES; PREDOMINATE; COMPETITION; ATTENTION; OBJECTS; TASK;
D O I
10.1016/j.jesp.2011.08.009
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Does subjective reward value influence early visual perception? During binocular rivalry, one eye receives an image that is incompatible with the image the other eye receives. People consciously experience perceiving one image; the other image is suppressed from conscious awareness. We tested if subjective value functions as an endogenous influence (i.e., one internal to the perceiver) on dominance during rivalry. Images associated with rewards achieved initial perceptual dominance more often than images associated with cost (Studies 1-3). Value facilitated perception of rewarding images but did not inhibit perception of costly images (Study 3). Additionally, when rewards benefited a disliked person, no bias in perceptual dominance was observed. Subjective value biased dominance despite accuracy incentives and was not explained by frequency of exposure, implicit learning, response bias, or task-specific accessibility. We discuss implications for the influence of motivated influences on perception, a phenomenon we call wishful seeing. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:122 / 129
页数:8
相关论文
共 37 条
[11]   Onset Rivalry: Brief Presentation Isolates an Early Independent Phase of Perceptual Competition [J].
Carter, Olivia ;
Cavanagh, Patrick .
PLOS ONE, 2007, 2 (04)
[12]   Separable neural components in the processing of black and white faces [J].
Cunningham, WA ;
Johnson, MK ;
Raye, CL ;
Gatenby, JC ;
Gore, JC ;
Banaji, MR .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2004, 15 (12) :806-813
[13]   Affective flexibility - Evaluative processing goals shape amygdala activity [J].
Cunningham, William A. ;
Van Bavel, Jay J. ;
Johnsen, Ingrid R. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2008, 19 (02) :152-160
[15]  
Dunning D., 2001, Blackwell handbook of social psychology, V1, P348, DOI DOI 10.1002/9780470998519.ch16
[16]   NEW LOOK AT NEW LOOK - PERCEPTUAL DEFENSE AND VIGILANCE [J].
ERDELYI, MH .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1974, 81 (01) :1-25
[17]   AN EXPERIMENTAL AND THEORETICAL-ANALYSIS OF PERCEPTUAL DEFENSE [J].
ERIKSEN, CW ;
BROWNE, CT .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1956, 52 (02) :224-230
[18]   Cortical responses to invisible objects in the human dorsal and ventral pathways [J].
Fang, F ;
He, S .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2005, 8 (10) :1380-1385
[19]  
Fox R, 1991, BINOCULAR VISION, V9, P93
[20]   Processing of invisible stimuli: Advantage of upright faces and recognizable words in overcoming interocular suppression [J].
Jiang, Yi ;
Costello, Patricia ;
He, Sheng .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2007, 18 (04) :349-355