Third-generation prospect theory

被引:197
作者
Schmidt, Ulrich [3 ,4 ]
Starmer, Chris [1 ]
Sugden, Robert [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Sch Econ, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[2] Univ E Anglia, Sch Econ, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
[3] Kiel Inst World Econ, D-24105 Kiel, Germany
[4] Univ Kiel, Dept Econ, D-24098 Kiel, Germany
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
prospect theory; preference reversal; reference dependence;
D O I
10.1007/s11166-008-9040-2
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We present a new theory of decision under uncertainty: third-generation prospect theory (PT(3)). This retains the predictive power of previous versions of prospect theory, but extends that theory by allowing reference points to be uncertain while decision weights are specified in a rank-dependent way. We show that PT(3) preferences respect a state-conditional form of stochastic dominance. The theory predicts the observed tendency for willingness-to-accept valuations of lotteries to be greater than willingness-to-pay valuations. When PT(3) is made operational by using simple functional forms with parameter values derived from existing experimental evidence, it predicts observed patterns of the preference reversal phenomenon.
引用
收藏
页码:203 / 223
页数:21
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Parameter-free elicitation of utility and probability weighting functions [J].
Abdellaoui, M .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2000, 46 (11) :1497-1512
[2]   Choice-based elicitation and decomposition of decision weights for gains and losses under uncertainty [J].
Abdellaoui, M ;
Vossmann, F ;
Weber, M .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2005, 51 (09) :1384-1399
[3]  
BarHillel M, 1996, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V70, P17
[4]   Stochastic dominance and cumulative prospect theory [J].
Baucells, Manel ;
Heukamp, Franz H. .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2006, 52 (09) :1409-1423
[5]   Gain-loss separability and coalescing in risky decision making [J].
Birnbaum, Michael H. ;
Bahra, Jeffrey P. .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2007, 53 (06) :1016-1028
[6]   A parameter-free elicitation of the probability weighting function in medical decision analysis [J].
Bleichrodt, H ;
Pinto, JL .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2000, 46 (11) :1485-1496
[7]  
Camerer C.F., 1989, J. Risk Uncertainty, V2, P61, DOI [10.1007/BF00055711, DOI 10.1007/BF00055711]
[8]   REVERSAL OF THE PREFERENCE REVERSAL PHENOMENON [J].
CASEY, JT .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 48 (02) :224-251
[9]   Testing explanations of preference reversal [J].
Cubitt, RP ;
Munro, A ;
Starmer, C .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2004, 114 (497) :709-726
[10]  
DAVIES GB, 2004, CAMBRIDGE WORKING PA, V467