Producer-Level Benefits of Sustainability Certification

被引:169
作者
Blackman, Allen [1 ,2 ]
Rivera, Jorge [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Resources Future Inc, Washington, DC 20008 USA
[2] Environm Dev Ctr Cent Amer, Turrialba, Turrialba, Costa Rica
[3] George Washington Univ, Washington, DC 20052 USA
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
ecocertification; ecolabel; human-dominated landscape; ecocertificacion; eco-etiquetas; paisaje dominado por humanos; ORGANIC COFFEE PRODUCTION; FAIR-TRADE; FOREST CERTIFICATION; GREENER WHITER; FSC; CONSERVATION; PERFORMANCE; NICARAGUA; PROSPECTS; FARMERS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01774.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Initiatives certifying that producers of goods and services adhere to defined environmental and social-welfare production standards are increasingly popular. According to proponents, these initiatives create financial incentives for producers to improve their environmental, social, and economic performance. We reviewed the evidence on whether these initiatives have such benefits. We identified peer-reviewed, ex post, producer-level studies in economic sectors in which certification is particularly prevalent (bananas, coffee, fish products, forest products, and tourism operations), classified these studies on the basis of whether their design and methods likely generated credible results, summarized findings from the studies with credible results, and considered how these findings might guide future research. We found 46 relevant studies, most of which focused on coffee and forest products and examined fair-trade and Forest Stewardship Council certification. The methods used in 11 studies likely generated credible results. Of these 11 studies, nine examined the economic effects and two the environmental effects of certification. The results of four of the 11 studies, all of which examined economic effects, showed that certification has producer-level benefits. Hence, the evidence to support the hypothesis that certification benefits the environment or producers is limited. More evidence could be generated by incorporating rigorous, independent evaluation into the design and implementation of projects promoting certification.
引用
收藏
页码:1176 / 1185
页数:10
相关论文
共 58 条
[51]  
Shreck A., 2002, International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food, V10, P13
[52]  
Sick D, 2008, LAT AM RES REV, V43, P193
[53]   Assessing the Impact of Fair Trade Coffee: Towards an Integrative Framework [J].
Utting, Karla .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2009, 86 :127-149
[54]   Does fair trade make a difference? The case of small coffee producers in Nicaragua [J].
Utting-Chamorro, Karla .
DEVELOPMENT IN PRACTICE, 2005, 15 (3-4) :584-599
[55]   Impacts of Fair Trade certification on coffee farmers, cooperatives, and laborers in Nicaragua [J].
Valkila, Joni ;
Nygren, Anja .
AGRICULTURE AND HUMAN VALUES, 2010, 27 (03) :321-333
[56]   Fair Trade organic coffee production in Nicaragua - Sustainable development or a poverty trap? [J].
Valkila, Joni .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 68 (12) :3018-3025
[57]   Barriers to biodiversity conservation in marine fishery certification [J].
Ward, Trevor J. .
FISH AND FISHERIES, 2008, 9 (02) :169-177
[58]  
Zúñiga-Arias G, 2009, IMPACT OF FAIR TRADE, P99