The relationship between sequence and interaction divergence in proteins

被引:246
作者
Aloy, P [1 ]
Ceulemans, H [1 ]
Stark, A [1 ]
Russell, RB [1 ]
机构
[1] European Mol Biol Lab, Struct & Computat Biol Programme, D-69117 Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
protein; three-dimensional structure; interaction; sequence; function; CRYSTAL-STRUCTURE; PREDICTION; RECEPTOR; DATABASE; RECOGNITION; FOLDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmb.2003.07.006
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
There is currently a gap in knowledge between complexes of known three-dimensional structure and those known from other experimental methods such as affinity purifications or the two-hybrid system. This gap can sometimes be bridged by methods that extrapolate interaction information from one complex structure to homologues of the interacting proteins. To do this, it is important to know if and when proteins of the same type (e.g. family, superfamily or fold) interact in the same way. Here, we study interactions of known structure to address this question. We found all instances within the structural classification of proteins database of the same domain pairs interacting in different complexes, and then compared them with a simple measure (interaction RMSD). When plotted against sequence similarity we find that close homologues (30-40% or higher sequence identity) almost invariably interact the same way. Conversely, similarity only in fold (i.e. without additional evidence for a common ancestor) is only rarely associated with a similarity in interaction. The results suggest that there is a twilight zone of sequence similarity where it is not possible to say whether or not domains will interact similarly. We also discuss the rare instances of fold similarities interacting the same way, and those where obviously homologous proteins interact differently. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:989 / 998
页数:10
相关论文
共 39 条
[11]   ASTRAL compendium enhancements [J].
Chandonia, JM ;
Walker, NS ;
Conte, LL ;
Koehl, P ;
Levitt, M ;
Brenner, SE .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2002, 30 (01) :260-263
[12]   THE RELATION BETWEEN THE DIVERGENCE OF SEQUENCE AND STRUCTURE IN PROTEINS [J].
CHOTHIA, C ;
LESK, AM .
EMBO JOURNAL, 1986, 5 (04) :823-826
[13]   A structural explanation for the twilight zone of protein sequence homology [J].
Chung, SY ;
Subbiah, S .
STRUCTURE, 1996, 4 (10) :1123-1127
[14]  
Enright AJ, 2001, GENOME BIOL, V2
[15]   COMPARISON OF CONFORMATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS IN STRUCTURALLY SIMILAR PROTEIN PAIRS [J].
FLORES, TP ;
ORENGO, CA ;
MOSS, DS ;
THORNTON, JM .
PROTEIN SCIENCE, 1993, 2 (11) :1811-1826
[16]   The serine protease inhibitor canonical loop conformation: Examples found in extracellular hydrolases, toxins, cytokines and viral proteins [J].
Jackson, RM ;
Russell, RB .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2000, 296 (02) :325-334
[17]   Analysis of protein-protein interaction sites using surface patches [J].
Jones, S ;
Thornton, JM .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1997, 272 (01) :121-132
[18]   3-DIMENSIONAL STRUCTURE OF THE BETA-SUBUNIT OF ESCHERICHIA-COLI DNA POLYMERASE-III HOLOENZYME - A SLIDING DNA CLAMP [J].
KONG, XP ;
ONRUST, R ;
ODONNELL, M ;
KURIYAN, J .
CELL, 1992, 69 (03) :425-437
[19]   MOLSCRIPT - A PROGRAM TO PRODUCE BOTH DETAILED AND SCHEMATIC PLOTS OF PROTEIN STRUCTURES [J].
KRAULIS, PJ .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, 1991, 24 :946-950
[20]   CRYSTAL-STRUCTURE OF THE EUKARYOTIC DNA-POLYMERASE PROCESSIVITY FACTOR PCNA [J].
KRISHNA, TSR ;
KONG, XP ;
GARY, S ;
BURGERS, PM ;
KURIYAN, J .
CELL, 1994, 79 (07) :1233-1243